These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12214960)

  • 1. Individual differences during driver secondary task performance: verbal protocol and visual allocation findings.
    Lansdown TC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2002 Sep; 34(5):655-62. PubMed ID: 12214960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance.
    Horberry T; Anderson J; Regan MA; Triggs TJ; Brown J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jan; 38(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 16226211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating the influence of working memory capacity when driving behavior is combined with cognitive load: An LCT study of young novice drivers.
    Ross V; Jongen EM; Wang W; Brijs T; Brijs K; Ruiter RA; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():377-87. PubMed ID: 23915472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk.
    Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; McGehee DV; Manser M
    J Adolesc Health; 2015 Jul; 57(1 Suppl):S36-43. PubMed ID: 26112736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is it really good to talk? Testing the impact of providing concurrent verbal protocols on driving performance.
    Salmon PM; Goode N; Spiertz A; Thomas M; Grant E; Clacy A
    Ergonomics; 2017 Jun; 60(6):770-779. PubMed ID: 27684380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.
    Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fluctuating attentional demand in a simulated driving assessment: the roles of age and driving complexity.
    Stinchcombe A; Gagnon S; Zhang JJ; Montembeault P; Bedard M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):576-87. PubMed ID: 22133333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mileage, car ownership, experience of punishment avoidance, and the risky driving of young drivers.
    Scott-Parker B; Watson B; King MJ; Hyde MK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):559-67. PubMed ID: 22133331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driver's adaptive glance behavior to in-vehicle information systems.
    Peng Y; Boyle LN
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Dec; 85():93-101. PubMed ID: 26406538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distraction-induced driving error: an on-road examination of the errors made by distracted and undistracted drivers.
    Young KL; Salmon PM; Cornelissen M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():218-25. PubMed ID: 22727884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A strategically timed verbal task improves performance and neurophysiological alertness during fatiguing drives.
    Atchley P; Chan M; Gregersen S
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):453-62. PubMed ID: 24930168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: does it matter what aspects are automated?
    Carsten O; Lai FC; Barnard Y; Jamson AH; Merat N
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):747-61. PubMed ID: 23156620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance.
    Chaparro A; Wood JM; Carberry T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):747-54. PubMed ID: 16127341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Older driver distraction: a naturalistic study of behaviour at intersections.
    Charlton JL; Catchlove M; Scully M; Koppel S; Newstead S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():271-8. PubMed ID: 23332726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios.
    Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On-road and simulated driving: concurrent and discriminant validation.
    Mayhew DR; Simpson HM; Wood KM; Lonero L; Clinton KM; Johnson AG
    J Safety Res; 2011 Aug; 42(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 22017829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state.
    Merat N; Jamson AH; Lai FC; Carsten O
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):762-71. PubMed ID: 23156621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential.
    Louw T; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 23(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 27655754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does early training improve driving skills of young novice French drivers?
    Freydier C; Berthelon C; Bastien-Toniazzo M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():228-236. PubMed ID: 27544887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.