These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12215550)
1. PET/CT: comparison of quantitative tracer uptake between germanium and CT transmission attenuation-corrected images. Nakamoto Y; Osman M; Cohade C; Marshall LT; Links JM; Kohlmyer S; Wahl RL J Nucl Med; 2002 Sep; 43(9):1137-43. PubMed ID: 12215550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Feasibility of diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT for attenuation correction of whole body PET images]. Matsumoto K; Nakamoto Y; Sakamoto S; Murase K; Senda M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Jul; 63(7):757-65. PubMed ID: 17917337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correction for oral contrast artifacts in CT attenuation-corrected PET images obtained by combined PET/CT. Nehmeh SA; Erdi YE; Kalaigian H; Kolbert KS; Pan T; Yeung H; Squire O; Sinha A; Larson SM; Humm JL J Nucl Med; 2003 Dec; 44(12):1940-4. PubMed ID: 14660720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT vs 68Ge attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT system: evaluation of the effect of lowering the CT tube current. Kamel E; Hany TF; Burger C; Treyer V; Lonn AH; von Schulthess GK; Buck A Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Mar; 29(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 12002709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of activity expression between PET using 68Ge-68Ga line source attenuation correction and PET-CT using CT attenuation correction: impact on emission images]. Hayashi E; Iwase M; Kojima S; Nishio M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jun; 62(6):832-9. PubMed ID: 16799411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PET/CT: artifacts caused by bowel motion. Nakamoto Y; Chin BB; Cohade C; Osman M; Tatsumi M; Wahl RL Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Mar; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15094438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attenuation correction in whole-body FDG oncological studies: the role of statistical reconstruction. Lonneux M; Borbath I; Bol A; Coppens A; Sibomana M; Bausart R; Defrise M; Pauwels S; Michel C Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Jun; 26(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 10369944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Burger C; Goerres G; Schoenes S; Buck A; Lonn AH; Von Schulthess GK Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Jul; 29(7):922-7. PubMed ID: 12111133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [18F]FDG uptake in PET. Visvikis D; Costa DC; Croasdale I; Lonn AH; Bomanji J; Gacinovic S; Ell PJ Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Mar; 30(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 12634961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole-body positron emission tomography in clinical oncology: comparison between attenuation-corrected and uncorrected images. Bengel FM; Ziegler SI; Avril N; Weber W; Laubenbacher C; Schwaiger M Eur J Nucl Med; 1997 Sep; 24(9):1091-8. PubMed ID: 9283100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Head and neck imaging with PET and PET/CT: artefacts from dental metallic implants. Goerres GW; Hany TF; Kamel E; von Schulthess GK; Buck A Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Mar; 29(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 12002712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uptake in supraclavicular area fat ("USA-Fat"): description on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Cohade C; Osman M; Pannu HK; Wahl RL J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 12571205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lesion-to-background ratio in nonattenuation-corrected whole-body FDG PET images. Imran MB; Kubota K; Yamada S; Fukuda H; Yamada K; Fujiwara T; Itoh M J Nucl Med; 1998 Jul; 39(7):1219-23. PubMed ID: 9669398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Atlas-Based Attenuation Correction for Integrated PET/MR in Human Brain: Application of a Head Atlas and Comparison to True CT-Based Attenuation Correction. Sekine T; Buck A; Delso G; Ter Voert EE; Huellner M; Veit-Haibach P; Warnock G J Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 57(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 26493207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do hardware artefacts influence the performance of head and neck PET scans in patients with oral cavity squamous cell cancer? Goerres GW; Schmid DT; Eyrich GK Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):365-71. PubMed ID: 15070838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual-head gamma camera 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in oncological patients: effects of non-uniform attenuation correction on lesion detection. Zimny M; Kaiser HJ; Cremerius U; Reinartz P; Schreckenberger M; Sabri O; Buell U Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Aug; 26(8):818-23. PubMed ID: 10436193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinically significant inaccurate localization of lesions with PET/CT: frequency in 300 patients. Osman MM; Cohade C; Nakamoto Y; Marshall LT; Leal JP; Wahl RL J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):240-3. PubMed ID: 12571215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of iterative reconstruction, attenuation correction, and image fusion in the interpretation of FDG PET images with an integrated dual-head coincidence camera and X-ray-based attenuation maps. Delbeke D; Martin WH; Patton JA; Sandler MP Radiology; 2001 Jan; 218(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 11152796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]