127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12215991)
1. Use of ultrasound to assess healing of a mandibular distraction wound.
Thurmüller P; Troulis M; O'Neill MJ; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Sep; 60(9):1038-44. PubMed ID: 12215991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound: assessment of the distraction osteogenesis wound in patients undergoing mandibular lengthening.
Troulis MJ; Coppe C; O'Neill MJ; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 61(10):1144-9. PubMed ID: 14586848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of biomechanical stiffness with plain radiographic and ultrasound data in an experimental mandibular distraction wound.
Kaban LB; Thurmüller P; Troulis MJ; Glowacki J; Wahl D; Linke B; Rahn B; Perrott DH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jun; 32(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 12767878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction wound by computed tomography.
Zimmermann CE; Harris G; Thurmüller P; Troulis MJ; Perrott DH; Rahn B; Kaban LB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Sep; 33(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 15308257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone.
Glowacki J; Shusterman EM; Troulis M; Holmes R; Perrott D; Kaban LB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Feb; 113(2):566-73. PubMed ID: 14758219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of distracted mandibular bone using computed tomography scan and ultrasonography: technical note.
Selim H; Elbargothy N; Nabil Y; El-Hakim I
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jul; 38(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 19474254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. To determine the efficacy of ultrasonography in the evaluation of bone fill at the regenerate site for mandibular distraction osteogenesis over clinical and radiographic assessment- An in vivo prospective study.
Andrade N; Aggrawal N; Jadhav G; Sahu V; Mathai PC
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2018; 8(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 29892528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a mechanical testing system for a mandibular distraction wound.
Perrott DH; Rahn B; Wahl D; Linke B; Thurüller P; Troulis M; Glowacki J; Kaban LB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 14759112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of the mandibular distraction zone using ultrasonography and conventional radiography.
Issar Y; Sahoo NK; Sinha R; Satija L; Chattopadhyay PK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 May; 43(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 24393569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histomorphometric analysis of the porcine mandibular distraction wound.
Lawler ME; Tayebaty FT; Williams WB; Troulis MJ; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1543-54. PubMed ID: 20561467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model.
Troulis MJ; Glowacki J; Perrott DH; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 May; 58(5):507-13; discussion 514. PubMed ID: 10800906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histology of the porcine mandibular distraction wound.
Zimmermann CE; Thurmüller P; Troulis MJ; Perrott DH; Rahn B; Kaban LB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jun; 34(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 16053852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Ultrasound of segment distraction and callus formation in reconstruction of the mandible. Value of surgical ultrasound of callus distraction of vascularized ilial crest transplants and mandibular segments in a previously irradiated area].
Friedrich RE; Hellner D; Plambeck K; Schmelzle R
Ultraschall Med; 1997 Aug; 18(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 9381127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: evaluation of callus distraction by B-scan ultrasonography.
Nocini PF; Albanese M; Wangerin K; Fior A; Trevisiol L; Kretschmer W
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2002 Oct; 30(5):286-91. PubMed ID: 12377201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-level laser effect on mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Miloro M; Miller JJ; Stoner JA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 65(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 17236917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acceleration of callus maturation using rhOP-1 in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a rat model.
Terheyden H; Wang H; Warnke PH; Springer I; Erxleben A; Ludwig K; Rueger DC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 14759113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle.
Peacock ZS; Tricomi BJ; Faquin WC; Magill JC; Murphy BA; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 26(8):2320-4. PubMed ID: 26594967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proliferation of masseter myocytes after distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible.
Castaño FJ; Troulis MJ; Glowacki J; Kaban LB; Yates KE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Mar; 59(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 11243613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuous and intermittent bone distraction using a microhydraulic cylinder: an experimental study in minipigs.
Wiltfang J; Kessler P; Merten HA; Neukam FW
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Feb; 39(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 11178848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated continuous distraction osteogenesis may allow faster distraction rates: a preliminary study.
Peacock ZS; Tricomi BJ; Murphy BA; Magill JC; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1073-84. PubMed ID: 23499159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
