127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12215991)
21. Gray-scale ultrasonography in the evaluation of bone callus in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: initial findings.
Bruno C; Minniti S; Buttura-da-Prato E; Albanese M; Nocini PF; Pozzi-Mucelli R
Eur Radiol; 2008 May; 18(5):1012-7. PubMed ID: 18224324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ultrasound can predict regenerate stiffness in distraction osteogenesis.
Bail HJ; Kolbeck S; Krummrey G; Weiler A; Windhagen HJ; Hennies K; Raun K; Raschke MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Nov; (404):362-7. PubMed ID: 12439281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of expansion rates on mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a computational analysis.
Boccaccio A; Pappalettere C; Kelly DJ
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 35(11):1940-60. PubMed ID: 17768683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible.
Thurmüller P; Troulis MJ; Rosenberg A; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Nov; 60(11):1327-33. PubMed ID: 12420269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on bone formation during mandible distraction osteogenesis in a canine model--a preliminary study.
Ding Y; Li G; Zhang X; Ao J; Liu W; Ma Q; Liu Y; Liu B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2431-9. PubMed ID: 19837313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of 2 different distraction-compression models on new bone generation.
Ozgül S; Akdeniz ZD; Celebiler O; Alcan T; Sav A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):e490-9. PubMed ID: 22907114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. IGF-I, TGF-beta, and BMP-4 are expressed during distraction osteogenesis of the pig mandible.
Yates KE; Troulis MJ; Kaban LB; Glowacki J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Apr; 31(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 12102416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Continuous mandibular distraction osteogenesis: novel device and preliminary results in minipigs.
Goldwaser BR; Magill J; Papadaki ME; Byl M; Kromann R; Yates B; Morency J; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 71(4):e168-77. PubMed ID: 23507324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of electrical stimulation on mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Hagiwara T; Bell WH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 28(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 10851668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Laser versus ultrasound on bone density recuperation after distraction osteogenesis-a cone-beam computer tomographic analysis.
Andrade Gomes do Nascimento LE; Sant'anna EF; Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas A; Issamu Nojima L; Gonçalves Filho AC; Antônio Pereira Freitas S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):921-8. PubMed ID: 23351480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible with a modified intraoral appliance: a pilot study in miniature pigs.
Holzhauer DP; Larsen PE; Miloro M; Vig KW
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 9835823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dental stability and radiographic healing patterns after mandibular symphysis widening with distraction osteogenesis.
Chung YW; Tae KC
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Jun; 29(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 17317863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiographic results of callus distraction aided by pulsed low-intensity ultrasound.
Mayr E; Laule A; Suger G; Rüter A; Claes L
J Orthop Trauma; 2001 Aug; 15(6):407-14. PubMed ID: 11514767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 99mTechnetium-methylene diphosphonate bone imaging using low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: promotion of bone formation during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in dogs.
Ding Y; Li G; Ao J; Zhou L; Ma Q; Liu Y
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 48(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 19482390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reconstruction of mandibular symphyseal defects by trifocal distraction osteogenesis: an experimental study in Rhesus.
Li J; Ying B; Hu J; Zhu S; Braun TW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 35(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 16185847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Ultrasound follow-up of callus distraction--an alternative to roentgen diagnosis?].
Richter D; Hahn MP; Ostermann PA; Ekkernkamp A; Muhr G
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1996; 113():931-3. PubMed ID: 9102029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of compression on the healing of experimental tibial fractures.
Sigurdsen U; Reikeras O; Utvag SE
Injury; 2011 Oct; 42(10):1152-6. PubMed ID: 20850739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Endoscopic mandibular osteotomy, and placement and activation of a semiburied distractor.
Troulis MJ; Perrott DH; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Sep; 57(9):1110-3. PubMed ID: 10484112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound shortens the treatment time in tibial distraction osteogenesis.
Salem KH; Schmelz A
Int Orthop; 2014 Jul; 38(7):1477-82. PubMed ID: 24390009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Dental assisted distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Results of an animal experimental study and initial clinical application].
Braumann B; Niederhagen B; Schmolke C; von Lindern JJ
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1999 Jan; 3(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 10077960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
