These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Demise of the mercury sphygmomanometer and the dawning of a new era in blood pressure measurement. O'Brien E Blood Press Monit; 2003 Feb; 8(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 12604931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of sphygmomanometers at pharmacies. Erdem DG; Erdem E; Dilek M; Aydogdu T; Selim N; Demiray F; Sari A; Akpolat T Kidney Blood Press Res; 2009; 32(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 19622898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In praise of mercury sphygmomanometers. Electronic readings of blood pressure seem to be higher than readings obtained with mercury sphygmomanometers. Ireland J BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7296):1249. PubMed ID: 11388188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace. Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Who should be taking the blood pressure? de Leeuw PW; Kroon AA Neth J Med; 2003 Oct; 61(10):304-6. PubMed ID: 14708906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated sphygmomanometers should not replace manual ones, based on current evidence. Turner MJ; van Schalkwyk JM Am J Hypertens; 2008 Aug; 21(8):845; author reply 846. PubMed ID: 18648356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Home blood pressure measurement with oscillometric upper-arm devices. Braam RL; Thien T Neth J Med; 2003 Oct; 61(10):307-12. PubMed ID: 14708907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Defects in sphygmomanometers: an underdiagnosed condition? A survey of sphygmomanometers in Nord-Trøndelag county]. Holmen J Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1983 Aug; 103(22):1530-3. PubMed ID: 6636066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pressure for change: unresolved issues in blood pressure measurement. Aylett M Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Feb; 49(439):136-9. PubMed ID: 10326270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Blood pressure measurement]. Bang LE; Wiinberg N Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Jun; 171(24):2001-4. PubMed ID: 19523361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of pulse pressure on the accuracy of wrist blood pressure measurement. Westhoff TH; Schmidt S; Meissner R; Zidek W; van der Giet M J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Jun; 23(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 19092843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study. Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The blood pressure measurement--revisited. Safar ME; Smulyan H Am Heart J; 2006 Sep; 152(3):417-9. PubMed ID: 16923406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol. Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]