882 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12216559)
1. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients.
Wood RE; Maxymiw WG; McComb D
Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-year clinical performance of glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in xerostomic head- and neck-irradiated cancer patients.
De Moor RJ; Stassen IG; van 't Veldt Y; Torbeyns D; Hommez GM
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Feb; 15(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 19997859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
Tam LE; Chan GP; Yim D
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 9227122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: a clinical comparison.
Haveman CW; Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Carlson K
J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Feb; 134(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 12636121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations and in vitro secondary caries formation in coronal enamel.
Hicks MJ; Flaitz CM
Quintessence Int; 2000 Sep; 31(8):570-8. PubMed ID: 11203979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A resin-modified glass ionomer restorative: three-year clinical results.
Duke ES; Trevino DF
J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1998; 77(3):13-6, 25. PubMed ID: 10530103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dental materials for the restoration of root surface caries.
Burgess JO
Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):342-51. PubMed ID: 8695014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
Brackett WW; Gilpatrick RO; Browning WD; Gregory PN
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10337292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
Donly KJ; Segura A
Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials.
Attar N; Onen A
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11990054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years.
Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Kieri C
Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15241909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro evaluation of secondary caries development in enamel and root dentin around luted metallic restoration.
Shinkai RS; Cury AA; Cury JA
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 11203778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
