These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Factors associated with amalgam restorations in Taiwan. Hu SW; Yang LC; Chang HY Br Dent J; 2002 Oct; 193(7):411-4. PubMed ID: 12420015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival time of Class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment. Sjögren P; Halling A Swed Dent J; 2002; 26(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 12462873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques. El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term survival of endodontically treated molars without crown coverage: a retrospective cohort study. Nagasiri R; Chitmongkolsuk S J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 15674228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Restoration of posterior teeth in clinical practice: evidence base for choosing amalgam versus composite. Kovarik RE Dent Clin North Am; 2009 Jan; 53(1):71-6, ix. PubMed ID: 19215745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options. Lyons K; N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems. Haj-Ali R; Walker MP; Williams K Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):369-75; quiz 376, 367-8. PubMed ID: 16252541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioaesthetic ceromer restorations for the replacement of existing posterior amalgam restorations. Ahmad I Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 May; 10(4):416-8, 420. PubMed ID: 9655048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 1): variation by type of restoration and re-intervention. Lucarotti PS; Holder RL; Burke FJ J Dent; 2005 Nov; 33(10):805-15. PubMed ID: 16221519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Class I and Class II silver amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations: teaching approaches in Canadian faculties of dentistry. McComb D J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 71(6):405-6. PubMed ID: 15955263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior amalgam restorations--usage, regulation, and longevity. Mitchell RJ; Koike M; Okabe T Dent Clin North Am; 2007 Jul; 51(3):573-89, v. PubMed ID: 17586144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent: direct posterior composite versus amalgam. Dlugokinski M; Browning WD J Am Coll Dent; 2001; 68(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 11764638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]