These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12216653)

  • 21. The effect of the supplementation with a primary carbon source on the resistance to oxygen exposure of methanogenic sludge.
    Estrada-Vázquez C; Macarie H; Kato MT; Rodríguez-Vázquez R; Esparza-García F; Poggi-Varaldo HM
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(6):119-24. PubMed ID: 14640208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of substrate concentrations on the growth of heterotrophic bacteria and algae in secondary facultative ponds.
    Kayombo S; Mbwette TS; Katima JH; Jorgensen SE
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2937-43. PubMed ID: 12767296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Membrane bioreactors for winery wastewater treatment: case-studies at full scale.
    Guglielmi G; Andreottola G; Foladori P; Ziglio G
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(5):1201-7. PubMed ID: 19717906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Application of COD fractionation by a new combined technique: comparison of various wastewaters and sources of variability.
    Spérandio M; Urbain V; Ginestet P; Audic MJ; Paul E
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 11379089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Calibrating a side-stream membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No. 1.
    Jiang T; Liu X; Kennedy MD; Schippers JC; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):359-67. PubMed ID: 16459810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of solid retention time on the rheology of MBR sludge.
    Giordano C; Pollice A; Laera G; Saturno D; Mininni G
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):151-9. PubMed ID: 17978443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of substrate surface loading on the kinetic behaviour of aerobic granules.
    Liu Y; Liu YQ; Wang ZW; Yang SF; Tay JH
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2005 Jun; 67(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 15647939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Zero net growth in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention.
    Laera G; Pollice A; Saturno D; Giordano C; Lopez A
    Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):5241-9. PubMed ID: 16290181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modelling nitrification, heterotrophic growth and predation in activated sludge.
    Moussa MS; Hooijmans CM; Lubberding HJ; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):5080-98. PubMed ID: 16313939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Decentralised treatment of concentrated sewage at low temperature in a two-step anaerobic system: two upflow-hybrid septic tanks.
    Elmitwalli TA; Sayed S; Groendijk L; van Lier J; Zeeman G; Lettinga G
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(6):219-26. PubMed ID: 14640221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of chlorine on filamentous microorganisms present in activated sludge as evaluated by respirometry and INT-dehydrogenase activity.
    Caravelli A; Giannuzzi L; Zaritzky N
    Water Res; 2004 May; 38(9):2394-404. PubMed ID: 15142801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of dissolved oxygen on PHB accumulation in activated sludge cultures.
    Third KA; Newland M; Cord-Ruwisch R
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Apr; 82(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 12584766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Molecular assessment of ammonia- and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in full-scale activated sludge wastewater treatment plants.
    Robinson KG; Dionisi HM; Harms G; Layton AC; Gregory IR; Sayler GS
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):119-26. PubMed ID: 14682578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short-term batch studies on biological removal of chromium from synthetic wastewater using activated sludge biomass.
    Chen Y; Gu G
    Bioresour Technol; 2005 Oct; 96(15):1722-9. PubMed ID: 16023576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microscopic versus macroscopic biomass models in activated sludge systems.
    Gujer W
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):1-11. PubMed ID: 11989862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Kinetic properties of a commercial and a native inoculum for aerobic milk fat degradation.
    Loperena L; Saravia V; Murro D; Ferrari MD; Lareo C
    Bioresour Technol; 2006 Nov; 97(16):2160-5. PubMed ID: 16300941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling of chlorine effect on floc forming and filamentous micro-organisms of activated sludges.
    Caravelli A; Contreras EM; Giannuzzi L; Zaritzky N
    Water Res; 2003 May; 37(9):2097-105. PubMed ID: 12691895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical modeling and optimization of biomass granulation and COD removal in UASB reactors treating low strength wastewaters.
    Bhunia P; Ghangrekar MM
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):4229-38. PubMed ID: 17936620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimizing sequencing batch reactor (SBR) reactor operation for treatment of dairy wastewater with aerobic granular sludge.
    Wichern M; Lübken M; Horn H
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(6):1199-206. PubMed ID: 18845857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Toxicity assessment of common xenobiotic compounds on municipal activated sludge: comparison between respirometry and Microtox.
    Ricco G; Tomei MC; Ramadori R; Laera G
    Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(8):2103-10. PubMed ID: 15087191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.