These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12216874)

  • 1. Efficient computation of minimum-variance wave-front reconstructors with sparse matrix techniques.
    Ellerbroek BL
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 Sep; 19(9):1803-16. PubMed ID: 12216874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preconditioned conjugate gradient wave-front reconstructors for multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Gilles L; Ellerbroek BL; Vogel CR
    Appl Opt; 2003 Sep; 42(26):5233-50. PubMed ID: 14503692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Closed-loop stability and performance analysis of least-squares and minimum-variance control algorithms for multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Gilles L
    Appl Opt; 2005 Feb; 44(6):993-1002. PubMed ID: 15751690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods for correcting tilt anisoplanatism in laser-guide-star-based multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Ellerbroek BL; Rigaut F
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Oct; 18(10):2539-47. PubMed ID: 11583271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Split atmospheric tomography using laser and natural guide stars.
    Gilles L; Ellerbroek BL
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Oct; 25(10):2427-35. PubMed ID: 18830320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. LSPV+7, a branch-point-tolerant reconstructor for strong turbulence adaptive optics.
    Steinbock MJ; Hyde MW; Schmidt JD
    Appl Opt; 2014 Jun; 53(18):3821-31. PubMed ID: 24979411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wave-front sensing and deformable-mirror control in strong scintillation.
    Roggemann MC; Koivunen AC
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2000 May; 17(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 10795640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fast iterative tomographic wavefront estimation with recursive Toeplitz reconstructor structure for large-scale systems.
    Ono YH; Correia C; Conan R; Blanco L; Neichel B; Fusco T
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2018 Aug; 35(8):1330-1345. PubMed ID: 30110295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Order-N sparse minimum-variance open-loop reconstructor for extreme adaptive optics.
    Gilles L
    Opt Lett; 2003 Oct; 28(20):1927-9. PubMed ID: 14587778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laser guide star wavefront sensing for ground-layer adaptive optics on extremely large telescopes.
    Clare RM; Le Louarn M; Béchet C
    Appl Opt; 2011 Feb; 50(4):473-83. PubMed ID: 21283238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Branch-point reconstruction in laser beam projection through turbulence with finite-degree-of-freedom phase-only wave-front correction.
    Roggemann MC; Koivunen AC
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2000 Jan; 17(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 10641838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Numerical simulations of multiconjugate adaptive optics wave-front reconstruction on giant telescopes.
    Ellerbroek BL; Gilles L; Vogel CR
    Appl Opt; 2003 Aug; 42(24):4811-8. PubMed ID: 12952324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient reconstruction method for ground layer adaptive optics with mixed natural and laser guide stars.
    Wagner R; Helin T; Obereder A; Ramlau R
    Appl Opt; 2016 Feb; 55(6):1421-9. PubMed ID: 26906596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Local, hierarchic, and iterative reconstructors for adaptive optics.
    MacMartin DG
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2003 Jun; 20(6):1084-93. PubMed ID: 12801176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of artificial neural networks for Hartmann-sensor lenslet centroid estimation.
    Montera DA; Welsh BM; Roggemann MC; Ruck DW
    Appl Opt; 1996 Oct; 35(29):5747-57. PubMed ID: 21127584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sparse matrix approximation method for an active optical control system.
    Murphy TP; Lyon RG; Dorband JE; Hollis JM
    Appl Opt; 2001 Dec; 40(35):6505-14. PubMed ID: 18364958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal wave-front reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Fusco T; Conan JM; Rousset G; Mugnier LM; Michau V
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Oct; 18(10):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11583270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling low order aberrations in laser guide star adaptive optics systems.
    Clare RM; van Dam MA; Bouchez AH
    Opt Express; 2007 Apr; 15(8):4711-25. PubMed ID: 19532717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intensity-enhanced deep network wavefront reconstruction in Shack-Hartmann sensors.
    DuBose TB; Gardner DF; Watnik AT
    Opt Lett; 2020 Apr; 45(7):1699-1702. PubMed ID: 32235977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a MEMS deformable mirror for an adaptive optics test bench.
    Wallace BP; Hampton PJ; Bradley CH; Conan R
    Opt Express; 2006 Oct; 14(22):10132-8. PubMed ID: 19529409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.