These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12217434)

  • 1. Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight with the use of computerized artificial neural network model.
    Chuang L; Hwang JY; Chang CH; Yu CH; Chang FM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 28(8):991-6. PubMed ID: 12217434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficient fetal size classification combined with artificial neural network for estimation of fetal weight.
    Cheng YC; Yan GL; Chiu YH; Chang FM; Chang CH; Chung KC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Dec; 51(4):545-53. PubMed ID: 23276557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Estimation of fetal weight on the basis of neural network].
    Wu J; Yang T; Lin J; Luo H; Li D; Wang T; Zheng C
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 22(5):922-5, 929. PubMed ID: 16294722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional ultrasound-assessed fetal thigh volumetry in predicting birth weight.
    Chang FM; Liang RI; Ko HC; Yao BL; Chang CH; Yu CH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 90(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 9277639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
    Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
    Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Akaike information criterion and minimum mean square error mode in compensating for ultrasonographic errors for estimation of fetal weight by new operators.
    Cheng YC; Chiu YH; Wang HC; Chang FM; Chung KC; Chang CH; Cheng KS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 52(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 23548217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal ultrasound image segmentation system and its use in fetal weight estimation.
    Yu J; Wang Y; Chen P
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2008 Dec; 46(12):1227-37. PubMed ID: 18850125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
    Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of fetal weight in fetuses with abdominal wall defects: comparison of 2 recent sonographic formulas to the Hadlock formula.
    Nicholas S; Tuuli MG; Dicke J; Macones GA; Stamilio D; Odibo AO
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1069-74. PubMed ID: 20587430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy.
    Papageorghiou AT; Kemp B; Stones W; Ohuma EO; Kennedy SH; Purwar M; Salomon LJ; Altman DG; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Pang R; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Jaffer YA; Victora CG; Bhutta ZA; Villar J;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):719-726. PubMed ID: 26924421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Good accuracy of ultrasound estimations of fetal weight performed by midwives.
    Mattsson N; Rosendahl H; Luukkaala T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(6):688-92. PubMed ID: 17520400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New sonographic method for fetuses with small abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
    Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21630187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does use of a sex-specific model improve the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation?
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Ben-Haroush A; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):549-57. PubMed ID: 21837761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New sonographic method for fetuses with a large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
    Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 21080309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regression formula for estimation of fetal weight with use of abdominal circumference and femur length: a prospective study.
    Ferrero A; Maggi E; Giancotti A; Torcia F; Pachì A
    J Ultrasound Med; 1994 Nov; 13(11):823-33. PubMed ID: 7837327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the accuracy of ultrasonography fetal weight estimation models; assessing regression formulae in a Turkish population.
    Özdamar Ö; Gün I; Öner Ö; Özden O
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 25383742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
    Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
    Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
    Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
    J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.