134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12217440)
1. Pressure-dependent attenuation in ultrasound contrast agents.
Chen Q; Zagzebski J; Wilson T; Stiles T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 28(8):1041-51. PubMed ID: 12217440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physical and biochemical stability of Optison, an injectable ultrasound contrast agent.
Podell S; Burrascano C; Gaal M; Golec B; Maniquis J; Mehlhaff P
Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 1999 Dec; 30(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 10574690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Destruction of contrast agent microbubbles in the ultrasound field: the fate of the microbubble shell and the importance of the bubble gas content.
Klibanov AL; Hughes MS; Wojdyla JK; Wible JH; Brandenburger GH
Acad Radiol; 2002 May; 9 Suppl 1():S41-5. PubMed ID: 12019891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast agent bubble and erythrocyte behavior in a 1.5-MHz standing ultrasound wave.
Khanna S; Amso NN; Paynter SJ; Coakley WT
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1463-70. PubMed ID: 14597343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The disappearance of ultrasound contrast bubbles: observations of bubble dissolution and cavitation nucleation.
Chen WS; Matula TJ; Crum LA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Jun; 28(6):793-803. PubMed ID: 12113792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of microbubble destruction of three fluorocarbon-filled ultrasonic contrast agents.
Moran CM; Anderson T; Pye SD; Sboros V; McDicken WN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 May; 26(4):629-39. PubMed ID: 10856626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative measurements of second harmonic Doppler using ultrasound contrast agents.
Chang PH; Shung KK; Levene HB
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996; 22(9):1205-14. PubMed ID: 9123645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Broadband attenuation measurements of phospholipid-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.
Raymond JL; Haworth KJ; Bader KB; Radhakrishnan K; Griffin JK; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):410-21. PubMed ID: 24262056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents.
Chatterjee D; Sarkar K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Dec; 29(12):1749-57. PubMed ID: 14698342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonic characterization of the nonlinear properties of contrast microbubbles.
Shi WT; Forsberg F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Jan; 26(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 10687797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the suitability of broadband attenuation measurement for characterizing contrast microbubbles.
Chatterjee D; Sarkar K; Jain P; Schreppler NE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 15936494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro acoustic characterisation of four intravenous ultrasonic contrast agents at 30 MHz.
Moran CM; Watson RJ; Fox KA; McDicken WN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Jun; 28(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 12113791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monodisperse Versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Non-Linear Response, Sensitivity, and Deep Tissue Imaging Potential.
Segers T; Kruizinga P; Kok MP; Lajoinie G; de Jong N; Versluis M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1482-1492. PubMed ID: 29705522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro acoustic characterization of three phospholipid ultrasound contrast agents from 12 to 43 MHz.
Sun C; Sboros V; Butler MB; Moran CM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):541-50. PubMed ID: 24361219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of postexcitation thresholds for single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles using double passive cavitation detection.
King DA; Malloy MJ; Roberts AC; Haak A; Yoder CC; O'Brien WD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3449-55. PubMed ID: 20550244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of ultrasound pulses combined with Definity for targeted blood-brain barrier disruption: a feasibility study.
McDannold N; Vykhodtseva N; Hynynen K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 33(4):584-90. PubMed ID: 17337109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro characterization of the subharmonic ultrasound signal from Definity microbubbles at high frequencies.
Cheung K; Couture O; Bevan PD; Cherin E; Williams R; Burns PN; Foster FS
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1209-23. PubMed ID: 18296758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics and Echogenicity of Clinical Ultrasound Contrast Agents: An In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison Study.
Hyvelin JM; Gaud E; Costa M; Helbert A; Bussat P; Bettinger T; Frinking P
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 May; 36(5):941-953. PubMed ID: 28240842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles.
Grishenkov D; Kari L; Brodin LK; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20542310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of Needle and Catheter Size on Commercially Available Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Eisenbrey JR; Daecher A; Kramer MR; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1961-8. PubMed ID: 26384606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
