These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12219892)

  • 1. Recognition with and without identification: dissociative effects of meaningful encoding.
    Cleary AM
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):758-67. PubMed ID: 12219892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word-fragment cuing: the lexical search hypothesis.
    Nelson DL; Keelean PD; Negrao M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 2524544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Picture superiority in conceptual memory: dissociative effects of encoding and retrieval tasks.
    Vaidya CJ; Gabrieli JD
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1165-72. PubMed ID: 11126939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why do pictures produce priming on the word-fragment completion test? A study of encoding and retrieval factors.
    Weldon MS; Jackson-Barrett JL
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):519-28. PubMed ID: 8350743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of thought suppression in building mental blocks.
    Kozak M; Weylin Sternglanz R; Viswanathan U; Wegner DM
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1123-30. PubMed ID: 17576076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More on magnitude of priming in implicit memory tasks.
    Soler MJ; Ruiz JC; Dasí C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):889-94. PubMed ID: 12509191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthography, phonology, and meaning: word features that give rise to feelings of familiarity in recognition.
    Cleary AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 15376793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.
    Diana RA; Reder LM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):805-15. PubMed ID: 16822148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 2796741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Divided attention and indirect memory tests.
    Mulligan NW; Hartman M
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):453-65. PubMed ID: 8757494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integration of orthographic, conceptual, and episodic information on implicit and explicit tests.
    Weldon MS; Massaro DW
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1996 Mar; 50(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 8653099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthographic neighborhood effects in recognition and recall tasks in a transparent orthography.
    Justi FR; Jaeger A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):565-578. PubMed ID: 27685021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contingent dissociation between recognition and fragment completion: the method of triangulation.
    Hayman CA; Tulving E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):228-40. PubMed ID: 2522512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymmetric interference effects in fragment completion: the consequences of recognition failures and successes.
    Pilotti M; Chodorow M; Thornton KC
    Am J Psychol; 2004; 117(4):565-78. PubMed ID: 15605959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the relation between perceptual priming and recognition memory.
    Watkins MJ; Gibson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Jul; 14(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 2969944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):569-80. PubMed ID: 7476243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of divided attention on explicit and implicit aspects of recall].
    Wippich W; Schmitt R; Mecklenbräuker S
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1989; 36(2):328-48. PubMed ID: 2773526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of exact repetition and conceptual repetition on free recall and primed word-fragment completion.
    Roediger HL; Challis BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jan; 18(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 1532020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus exposure time and perceptual memory.
    von Hippel W; Hawkins C
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):525-35. PubMed ID: 7991350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.