BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12219994)

  • 1. Comparison of emedastine 0.05% or nedocromil sodium 2% eye drops and placebo in controlling local reactions in subjects with allergic conjunctivitis.
    Orfeo V; Vardaro A; Lena P; Mensitieri I; Tracey M; De Marco R
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2002; 12(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 12219994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled comparison of the efficacy of emedastine difumarate 0.05% ophthalmic solution and ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution in the human conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    D'Arienzo PA; Leonardi A; Bensch G
    Clin Ther; 2002 Mar; 24(3):409-16. PubMed ID: 11952024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emedastine ophthalmic solution 0.05% versus levocabastine ophthalmic suspension 0.05% in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Netland PA; Leahy C; Krenzer KL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 130(6):717-23. PubMed ID: 11124289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A placebo-controlled comparison of ketotifen fumarate and nedocromil sodium ophthalmic solutions for the prevention of ocular itching with the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Greiner JV; Minno G
    Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):1988-2005. PubMed ID: 12946546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of twice-daily emedastine 0.05% eye drops (Emadine eye drops) versus levocabastine 0.05% eye drops in patients with allergic conjunctivitis.
    Verin P; Easty DL; Secchi A; Ciprandi G; Partouche P; Nemeth-Wasmer G; Brancato R; Harrisberg CJ; Estivin-Ebrardt C; Coster DJ; Apel AJ; Coroneo MT; Knorr M; Carmichael TR; Kent-Smith BT; Abrantes P; Leonardi A; Cerqueti PM; Modorati G; Martinez M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):691-8. PubMed ID: 11384563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of emedastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution with loratadine 10 mg and their combination in the human conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB; Kaplan AP
    Clin Ther; 2002 Mar; 24(3):445-56. PubMed ID: 11952027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the onset and duration of effect of azelastine eye drops (0.05%) versus placebo in patients with allergic conjunctivitis using an allergen challenge model.
    Friedlaender MH; Harris J; LaVallee N; Russell H; Shilstone J
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Dec; 107(12):2152-7. PubMed ID: 11097587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo- and active-controlled trial.
    Crampton HJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):1975-87. PubMed ID: 12946545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the topical ocular antiallergic efficacy of emedastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution to ketorolac 0.5% ophthalmic solution in a clinical model of allergic conjunctivitis.
    Discepola M; Deschenes J; Abelson M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):43-6. PubMed ID: 10337432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and comfort of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in the human conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Butrus S; Greiner JV; Discepola M; Finegold I
    Clin Ther; 2000 Dec; 22(12):1462-72. PubMed ID: 11192137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.
    Spangler DL; Abelson MB; Ober A; Gotnes PJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Aug; 25(8):2245-67. PubMed ID: 14512132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of olopatadine HCI 0.1%, ketotifen fumarate 0.025%, epinastine HCI 0.05%, emedastine 0.05% and fluorometholone acetate 0.1% ophthalmic solutions for seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a placebo-controlled environmental trial.
    Borazan M; Karalezli A; Akova YA; Akman A; Kiyici H; Erbek SS
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 87(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 18631332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The anti-allergic effects of a cromolyn sodium-chlorpheniramine combination compared to ketotifen in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Leonardi A; Busca F; Tavolato M; Secchi AG
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2003 Mar; 13(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 12696630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy and safety of nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution b.i.d. in the treatment of ragweed seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
    Melamed J; Schwartz RH; Blumenthal MN; Zeitz HJ
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2000; 21(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 10951891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Lanier BQ; Abelson MB; Berger WE; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Spangler DL; Kägi MK
    Clin Ther; 2002 Jul; 24(7):1161-74. PubMed ID: 12182260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of comfort using olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers compared to placebo using the conjunctival allergen-challenge model.
    Brodsky M; Berger WE; Butrus S; Epstein AB; Irkec M
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Apr; 29(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12695716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ragweed pollen seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
    Blumenthal MN; Schwartz RH; Kaiser H
    Ocul Immunol Inflamm; 2000 Sep; 8(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 11120577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effects of emedastine eyedrops on acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis in children].
    Endre L
    Orv Hetil; 2003 Apr; 144(14):665-7. PubMed ID: 12795028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB; Greiner JV
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Dec; 20(12):1953-8. PubMed ID: 15701212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time to onset and duration of action of the antihistamine bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solutions 1.0% and 1.5% in allergic conjunctivitis: a phase III, single-center, prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, conjunctival allergen challenge assessment in adults and children.
    Abelson MB; Torkildsen GL; Williams JI; Gow JA; Gomes PJ; McNamara TR;
    Clin Ther; 2009 Sep; 31(9):1908-21. PubMed ID: 19843481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.