These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12220338)

  • 1. Methodology of oral sensory tests.
    Jacobs R; Wu CH; Van Loven K; Desnyder M; Kolenaar B; Van Steenberghed D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Aug; 29(8):720-30. PubMed ID: 12220338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishing a reliable protocol to measure tongue sensation.
    Boliek CA; Rieger JM; Li SY; Mohamed Z; Kickham J; Amundsen K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 34(6):433-41. PubMed ID: 17518978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study of sensory recovery following carpal tunnel release.
    Jimenez S; Hardy MA; Horch K; Jabaley M
    J Hand Ther; 1993; 6(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 8343878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric functions for efficient and effective psychophysical testing of sensory function.
    Vriens JP; Strijbos SA; van der Glas HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):797-804. PubMed ID: 21600735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensory perception threshold measurement: an evaluation of semiobjective testing devices.
    Halar EM; Hammond MC; LaCava EC; Camann C; Ward J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Aug; 68(8):499-507. PubMed ID: 3619613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extension of normal values on sensory function for facial areas using clinical tests on touch and two-point discrimination.
    Vriens JP; van der Glas HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 38(11):1154-8. PubMed ID: 19596558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infraorbital nerve function following treatment of orbitozygomatic complex fractures. A multitest approach.
    Vriens JP; van der Glas HW; Moos KF; Koole R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 27(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 9506295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technology literature review: quantitative sensory testing.
    Chong PS; Cros DP
    Muscle Nerve; 2004 May; 29(5):734-47. PubMed ID: 15116380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of current perception threshold electrical testing to clinical sensory testing for lingual nerve injuries.
    Ziccardi VB; Dragoo J; Eliav E; Benoliel R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22079068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing sensibility, including touch-pressure, two-point discrimination, point localization, and vibration.
    Bell-Krotoski J; Weinstein S; Weinstein C
    J Hand Ther; 1993; 6(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 8393725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A case-control study on the psychophysical and psychological characteristics of the phantom tooth phenomenon.
    Jacobs R; Wu CH; Goossens K; De Laat A; Van Loven K; Antonis Y; Lambrechts P; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2002 Mar; 6(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 11996164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verification of nerve integrity after surgical intervention using quantitative sensory testing.
    Said-Yekta S; Smeets R; Esteves-Oliveira M; Stein JM; Riediger D; Lampert F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 21802811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epicritic sensation in cervical spinal cord injury: diagnostic gains beyond testing light touch.
    Velstra IM; Bolliger M; Baumberger M; Rietman JS; Curt A
    J Neurotrauma; 2013 Aug; 30(15):1342-8. PubMed ID: 23895137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensory thresholds at different sites of the foot: a valuable reference for neurologic examinations.
    Zhang JW; Wang Q; Wang XF; Gao MM; Yun XP; Wu HF; Hong Y
    Spinal Cord; 2017 Apr; 55(4):396-398. PubMed ID: 27897183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative threshold changes in cutaneous sensation of patients with burns.
    Ward RS; Tuckett RP
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1991; 12(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 1779012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multicenter trial of the proficiency of smart quantitative sensation tests.
    Dyck PJ; Argyros B; Russell JW; Gahnstrom LE; Nalepa S; Albers JW; Lodermeier KA; Zafft AJ; Dyck PJ; Klein CJ; Litchy WJ; Davies JL; Carter RE; Melton LJ;
    Muscle Nerve; 2014 May; 49(5):645-53. PubMed ID: 23929701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans.
    Van Boven RW; Johnson KO
    Brain; 1994 Feb; 117 ( Pt 1)():149-67. PubMed ID: 8149208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of three sensory tests for diagnosis of sensory disturbances.
    Li XM; Yang Y; Hou Y; Yang JT; Qin BG; Fu G; Gu LQ
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2015 Jan; 31(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 25423030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acupuncture and sensory thresholds.
    Lundeberg T; Eriksson S; Lundeberg S; Thomas M
    Am J Chin Med; 1989; 17(3-4):99-110. PubMed ID: 2534464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of vibrotactile thresholds in women obtained with two psychophysical measurement methods].
    Harazin B; Kuprowski J; Harazin-Lechowska A
    Med Pr; 2004; 55(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 15620041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.