These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12222587)

  • 1. Case markers as clause boundary inducers in Japanese.
    Miyamoto ET
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2002 Jul; 31(4):307-47. PubMed ID: 12222587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online revision process in clause-boundary garden-path sentences.
    Fujita H
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 37468668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recycling prosodic boundaries.
    Hirose Y
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2003 Mar; 32(2):167-95. PubMed ID: 12690830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of animacy in Chinese relative clause processing.
    He W; Chen B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 23800546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Processing of new arguments at clause boundaries.
    Haberlandt K; Graesser AC
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 2927316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing relative clauses in Chinese.
    Hsiao F; Gibson E
    Cognition; 2003 Nov; 90(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 14597268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English.
    Carreiras M; Clifton C
    Lang Speech; 1993; 36 ( Pt 4)():353-72. PubMed ID: 8072346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of syntactic structure on the processing of lexical repetition during sentence reading.
    Lowder MW; Cardoso A; Pittman M; Zhou A
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jul; 51(5):1249-1263. PubMed ID: 36581728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing syntactically ambiguous sentences: evidence from semantic priming.
    Nicol JL; Pickering MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1993 Mar; 22(2):207-37. PubMed ID: 8366476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discourse structure and relative clause processing.
    Mak WM; Vonk W; Schriefers H
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 18323073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Agreement checking in comprehension: evidence from relative clauses.
    Deevy PL
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2000 Jan; 29(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 10723711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of restrictiveness on relative clause processing in Farsi.
    Seifi P; Loerts H; Mak P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Jul; 247():104299. PubMed ID: 38761751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Capturing individual differences in sentence processing: How reliable is the self-paced reading task?
    Frinsel FF; Christiansen MH
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38379113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of noun animacy on the processing of unambiguous sentences: evidence from French relative clauses.
    Baudiffier V; Caplan D; Gaonac'h D; Chesnet D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1896-905. PubMed ID: 21895558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Age and Location in Chinese Relative Clauses Processing.
    He W; Xu N; Ji R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1067-1086. PubMed ID: 28236141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Matrix Verb as a Source of Comprehension Difficulty in Object Relative Sentences.
    Staub A; Dillon B; Clifton C
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1353-1376. PubMed ID: 27813146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-Linguistic Differences in Processing Double-Embedded Relative Clauses: Working-Memory Constraints or Language Statistics?
    Frank SL; Trompenaars T; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):554-78. PubMed ID: 25943302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural computation and the role of morphological markings in the processing of Japanese.
    Yamashita H
    Lang Speech; 2000; 43(Pt 4):429-59. PubMed ID: 11419225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antilocality effect without head-final dependencies.
    Schwab J; Xiang M; Liu M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Mar; 48(3):446-463. PubMed ID: 35084924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disambiguation and Integration in Korean Relative Clause Processing.
    Mansbridge M; Park S; Tamaoka K
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Aug; 46(4):827-845. PubMed ID: 27943081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.