These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12222910)

  • 1. A comparison of the index of complexity outcome and need (ICON) with the peer assessment rating (PAR) and the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN).
    Fox NA; Daniels C; Gilgrass T
    Br Dent J; 2002 Aug; 193(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 12222910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring failure of orthodontic treatment: a comparison of outcome indicators.
    Fox NA; Chapple JR
    J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 31(4):319-22; discussion 301. PubMed ID: 15608347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of agreement and correlation of three occlusal indices in an assessment of orthodontic treatment need].
    Djordjević J; Sćepan I; Glisić B
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Feb; 68(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 21456304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Onyeaso CO; Begole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 17276867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between the ICON index and the dental and aesthetic components of the IOTN index.
    Borzabadi-Farahani A; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Eslamipour F
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 20209176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement between the index of complexity, outcome, and need and the dental and aesthetic components of the index of orthodontic treatment need.
    Borzabadi-Farahani A; Borzabadi-Farahani A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 21803261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are the Peer Assessment Rating Index and the Index of Treatment Complexity, Outcome, and Need suitable measures for orthognathic outcomes?
    Templeton KM; Powell R; Moore MB; Williams AC; Sandy JR
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Oct; 28(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 16648208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Occlusal outcomes in combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment.
    Almutairi FL; Hodges SJ; Hunt NP
    J Orthod; 2017 Mar; 44(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 27748646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparison of Three Orthodontic Treatment Indices with Regard to Angle Classification.
    Kaygisiz E; Uzuner FD; Taner L
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 26950821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occlusal indexes as judged by subjective opinions.
    Arruda AO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):671-5. PubMed ID: 18984400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The long-term benefits of orthodontic treatment.
    Linklater RA; Fox NA
    Br Dent J; 2002 May; 192(10):583-7. PubMed ID: 12075958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthodontic Treatment Need and the Psychosocial Impact of Malocclusion in 12-Year-Old Hong Kong Children.
    Baram D; Yang Y; Ren C; Wang Z; Wong RWK; Hägg U; McGrath C; Gu M
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2019; 2019():2685437. PubMed ID: 31281231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index as an index of orthodontic treatment need.
    Firestone AR; Beck FM; Beglin FM; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 12439473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Orthodontic treatment needs and indications assessed with IONT].
    Grzywacz I
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2004; 50(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 16871750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors influencing orthodontic treatment outcome in South East Wales and implications for service commissioning.
    Quach S; Popat H; Karki A; Playle R; Richmond S
    J Orthod; 2019 Dec; 46(4):311-322. PubMed ID: 31631744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability and validity of the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need for determining treatment need in Dutch orthodontic practice.
    Louwerse TJ; Aartman IH; Kramer GJ; Prahl-Andersen B
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 16278225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].
    Piskorski D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():335-51. PubMed ID: 15552857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of occlusal indices in high-impact literature.
    Bellot-Arcís C; Montiel-Company JM; Almerich-Silla JM; Paredes-Gallardo V; Gandía-Franco JL
    Community Dent Health; 2012 Mar; 29(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 22482249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need scored on plaster and digital models.
    Veenema AC; Katsaros C; Boxum SC; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 19329650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the complexity and treatment outcome components of the index of complexity, outcome, and need (ICON).
    Savastano NJ; Firestone AR; Beck FM; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Sep; 124(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 12970657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.