These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12223433)

  • 1. Joint effect of genes and environment distorted by selection biases: implications for hospital-based case-control studies.
    Wacholder S; Chatterjee N; Hartge P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Sep; 11(9):885-9. PubMed ID: 12223433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploiting gene-environment independence in family-based case-control studies: increased power for detecting associations, interactions and joint effects.
    Chatterjee N; Kalaylioglu Z; Carroll RJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 28(2):138-56. PubMed ID: 15593088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misclassification in case-control studies of gene-environment interactions: assessment of bias and sample size.
    Garcia-Closas M; Rothman N; Lubin J
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Dec; 8(12):1043-50. PubMed ID: 10613335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and analysis issues in case-control studies addressing genetic susceptibility.
    Brennan P
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (148):123-32. PubMed ID: 10493254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The case-combined-control design was efficient in detecting gene-environment interactions.
    Andrieu N; Goldstein AM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 57(7):662-71. PubMed ID: 15358394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study design options in evaluating gene-environment interactions: practical considerations for a planned case-control study of pediatric leukemia.
    Goodman M; Dana Flanders W
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2007 Apr; 48(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 16874764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating bias due to population stratification in epidemiologic studies of gene-gene or gene-environment interactions.
    Wang Y; Localio R; Rebbeck TR
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 16434597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of control selection bias in a hospital-based case-control study of upper aero-digestive tract cancers.
    Nishimoto IN; Pintos J; Schlecht NF; Torloni H; Carvalho AL; Kowalski LP; Franco EL
    J Cancer Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 7(3):131-41. PubMed ID: 12665212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increased power to detect gene-environment interaction using siblings controls.
    Andrieu N; Dondon MG; Goldstein AM
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 15(9):705-11. PubMed ID: 16157257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tests for gene-environment interaction from case-control data: a novel study of type I error, power and designs.
    Mukherjee B; Ahn J; Gruber SB; Rennert G; Moreno V; Chatterjee N
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 32(7):615-26. PubMed ID: 18473390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic dissection methods: designs used for tests of gene-environment interaction.
    Liu X; Fallin MD; Kao WH
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2004 Jun; 14(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15172665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Issues in the epidemiological analysis and interpretation of intermediate biomarkers.
    Rundle A; Schwartz S
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Jun; 12(6):491-6. PubMed ID: 12814992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection of subjects for hospital-based epidemiologic studies based on outward manifestations of disease.
    Nishioka SA; Gyorkos TW; Joseph L; Collet JP
    Clin Invest Med; 2001 Dec; 24(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 11767233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Roaming through methodology. XV. Smoking grandfathers and other selection biases].
    van Gijn J; Algra A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Jul; 143(29):1515-7. PubMed ID: 10443274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating interaction between genetic and environmental risk factors: efficiency of sampling designs within a cohort.
    Bureau A; Diallo MS; Ordovas JM; Cupples LA
    Epidemiology; 2008 Jan; 19(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 18091418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for error due to misclassification of exposures in case-control studies of gene-environment interaction.
    Zhang L; Mukherjee B; Ghosh M; Gruber S; Moreno V
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2756-83. PubMed ID: 17879261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epidemiological studies on genetic polymorphism: study design issues and measures of occurrence and association.
    Boffetta P; Pearce N
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (148):97-108. PubMed ID: 10493252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adjusting for selection bias in retrospective, case-control studies.
    Geneletti S; Richardson S; Best N
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 18482997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size requirements for indirect association studies of gene-environment interactions (G x E).
    Hein R; Beckmann L; Chang-Claude J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 32(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 18163529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.