These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12224055)

  • 1. Electrical impedance tomography via filtered-back projection of fan current distribution: a numerical simulation.
    De Simone BC; Siciliano R; Pachi' A; Cametti C; De Luca F
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2002 Oct; 23(7):516-21. PubMed ID: 12224055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
    Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains using boundary element shape-based inverse solutions.
    Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):637-47. PubMed ID: 17518058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic electrical impedance imaging with the interacting multiple model scheme.
    Kim KY; Kim BS; Kim MC; Kim S; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S217-33. PubMed ID: 15798235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the forward solver for the complete electrode model in EIT using algebraic multigrid.
    Soleimani M; Powell CE; Polydorides N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 15889545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phase artefact reduction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
    Lee BI; Park C; Pyo HC; Kwon O; Woo EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5277-88. PubMed ID: 17019038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Harmonic decomposition in PDE-based denoising technique for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
    Lee BI; Lee SH; Kim TS; Kwon O; Woo EJ; Seo JK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1912-20. PubMed ID: 16285395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
    Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging pathologic pulmonary air and fluid accumulation by functional and absolute EIT.
    Hahn G; Just A; Dudykevych T; Frerichs I; Hinz J; Quintel M; Hellige G
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S187-98. PubMed ID: 16636410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Simulation study of line electrode for electrical impedance tomography].
    Wang Y; Sha H; Ren C
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 24(5):986-9. PubMed ID: 18027681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method for modelling and optimizing an electrical impedance tomography system.
    Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S51-64. PubMed ID: 16636420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT).
    Merwa R; Hollaus K; Brunner P; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S241-50. PubMed ID: 15798237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noninvasive imaging of bioimpedance distribution by means of current reconstruction magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
    Gao N; He B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 May; 55(5):1530-8. PubMed ID: 18440899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Propagation of measurement noise through backprojection reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography.
    Frangi AF; Riu PJ; Rosell J; Viergever MA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):566-78. PubMed ID: 12166852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct reconstruction of tissue parameters from differential multifrequency EIT in vivo.
    Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Maier A; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16636423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EIT reconstructions and Faddeev solutions for a numerically simulated phantom chest.
    Mueller JL
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():213-8. PubMed ID: 15133960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MREIT.
    Oh SH; Lee BI; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Kim TS; Kwon O; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S279-88. PubMed ID: 15798241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
    Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a topology optimization approach.
    Mello LA; de Lima CR; Amato MB; Lima RG; Silva EC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):531-40. PubMed ID: 18269988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.