BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12225405)

  • 1. Factors affecting thresholds in allergic contact dermatitis: safety and regulatory considerations.
    Basketter DA; Evans P; Gerberick GF; Kimber IA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jul; 47(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12225405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA; Butler M; Gamer A; Garrigue JL; Gerberick GF; Newsome C; Steiling W; Vohr HW
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2003 Dec; 41(12):1799-809. PubMed ID: 14563405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thresholds in contact sensitization: immunologic mechanisms and experimental evidence in humans--an overview.
    Boukhman MP; Maibach HI
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):1125-34. PubMed ID: 11696387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classification criteria for skin-sensitizing chemicals: a commentary.
    Basketter DA; Flyvholm MA; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Apr; 40(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 10208502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental nickel elicitation thresholds--a review focusing on occluded nickel exposure.
    Fischer LA; Menné T; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Feb; 52(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 15725281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skin sensitization thresholds: determination in predictive models.
    Basketter DA; Cookman G; Gerberick GF; Hamaide N; Potokar M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1997; 35(3-4):417-25. PubMed ID: 9207904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
    Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose metrics in the acquisition of skin sensitization: thresholds and importance of dose per unit area.
    Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; McNamee PM; Lalko J; Api AM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Oct; 52(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 18423821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitizing potential of acetaldehyde and formaldehyde using a modified cumulative contact enhancement test (CCET).
    Bergh M; Karlberg AT
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Mar; 40(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 10073441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Allergic contact dermatitis--formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers.
    Karlberg AT; Bergström MA; Börje A; Luthman K; Nilsson JL
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Jan; 21(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 18052130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Airborne Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Management and Responsible Allergens on the American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Series.
    Kimyon RS; Warshaw EM
    Dermatitis; 2019; 30(2):106-115. PubMed ID: 30829811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
    Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis diagnosed by a systematic stepwise exposure assessment of allergens in the work environment.
    Friis UF; Menné T; Flyvholm MA; Bonde JP; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Sep; 69(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 23948033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency.
    Basketter DA; Balikie L; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Harvey P; Evans P; White IR; Rycroft RJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jun; 42(6):344-8. PubMed ID: 10871098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A quantitative approach to assess the potency of skin sensitizers in the elicitation phase.
    Ezendam J; Vermeulen JP; de Klerk A; de Jong WH; van Loveren H
    Toxicology; 2012 Sep; 299(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 22564262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cosmetics as causes of allergic contact dermatitis.
    Dooms-Goossens A
    Cutis; 1993 Nov; 52(5):316-20. PubMed ID: 8299396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact Dermatitis for the Practicing Allergist.
    Bernstein DI
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2015; 3(5):652-8; quiz 659-60. PubMed ID: 26362548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: which factors are relevant? (review of the literature).
    de Waard-van der Spek FB; Andersen KE; Darsow U; Mortz CG; Orton D; Worm M; Muraro A; Schmid-Grendelmeier P; Grimalt R; Spiewak R; Rudzeviciene O; Flohr C; Halken S; Fiocchi A; Borrego LM; Oranje AP
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2013 Jun; 24(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 23373713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allergic contact dermatitis elicitation thresholds of potent allergens in humans.
    Jerschow E; Hostýnek JJ; Maibach HI
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2001 Nov; 39(11):1095-108. PubMed ID: 11527569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The lymphocyte transformation test in allergic contact dermatitis: New opportunities.
    Popple A; Williams J; Maxwell G; Gellatly N; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    J Immunotoxicol; 2016; 13(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 25655136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.