121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12226611)
21. Effects of two silane coupling agents, a bonding agent, and thermal cycling on the bond strength of a CAD/CAM composite material cemented with two resin luting agents.
Yoshida K; Kamada K; Atsuta M
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 11208209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of chlorhexidine incorporation into a self-etching primer on dentine bond strength of a luting cement.
Hiraishi N; Yiu CK; King NM; Tay FR
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):496-502. PubMed ID: 20298738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surface antibacterial properties of packable resin composites: part I.
Matalon S; Slutzky H; Weiss EI
Quintessence Int; 2004 Mar; 35(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 15119676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro shear bond strength of resin-based luting cements to dentin.
Santos MJ; Driessen CH; de Freitas AP; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(4):e215-20. PubMed ID: 22782054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Are flowable resin-based composites a reliable material for metal orthodontic bracket bonding?
Pick B; Rosa V; Azeredo TR; Cruz Filho EA; Miranda WG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jul; 11(4):E017-24. PubMed ID: 20953560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Antibacterial Effect and Tensile Bond Strength of Self-etching Adhesive Resins with and without Methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium Bromide: An
Krishnamurthy M; Kumar VN; Leburu A; Dhanavel C; Selvendran KE; Praveen N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):409-414. PubMed ID: 29728545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of the incorporation of triclosan methacrylate on the physical properties and antibacterial activity of resin composite.
Paula AB; Alonso RCB; Taparelli JR; Camassari JR; Innocentini-Mei LH; Correr-Sobrinho L; Puppin-Rontani RM
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Sep; 27():e20180262. PubMed ID: 31508789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of flexural strength of orthodontic resin cement on bond strength of metal brackets to enamel surfaces.
Li J
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 20937669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Antimicrobial abilities of various dentine bonding agents and restorative materials.
Palenik CJ; Setcos JC
J Dent; 1996 Jul; 24(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 8783535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Antimicrobial power of composite resin adhesion systems.
Molgatini SL; Negroni M; Abate PF; Macchi RL
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 1994-1995; 8(2):37-47. PubMed ID: 11885228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
Blatz MB; Sadan A; Arch GH; Lang BR
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Antibacterial activity of dentin bonding systems, resin-modified glass ionomers, and polyacid-modified composite resins.
Meiers JC; Miller GA
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(6):257-64. PubMed ID: 9227120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Antibacterial properties of dentin bonding systems, polyacid-modified composite resins and composite resins.
Karanika-Kouma A; Dionysopoulos P; Koliniotou-Koubia E; Kolokotronis A
J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Feb; 28(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 11298264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microtensile bond strength of a new silorane-based composite resin adhesive.
Giacobbi MF; Vandewalle KS
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(3):e148-52. PubMed ID: 22623470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diametral tensile strength of four composite resin core materials with and without centered fiber dowels.
Driessen CH; Ji DY; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):e219-23. PubMed ID: 22313926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bond strength of orthodontic light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Cheng HY; Chen CH; Li CL; Tsai HH; Chou TH; Wang WN
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 20805142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the antimicrobial and physical properties of an orthodontic photo-activated adhesive modified with an antiplaque agent: an in vitro study.
Singh C; Dua V; Vyas M; Verma S
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(6):694-700. PubMed ID: 24552929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative analysis of S. mutans and S. sobrinus cultivated independently and adhered to polished orthodontic composite resins.
Velazquez-Enriquez U; Scougall-Vilchis RJ; Contreras-Bulnes R; Flores-Estrada J; Uematsu S; Yamaguchi R
J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(5):544-9. PubMed ID: 23138741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
