212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12227398)
1. Peritoneal function and adequacy calculations: current programs versus PD Adequest 2.0.
Teixidó-Planas J
Perit Dial Int; 2002; 22(3):386-93. PubMed ID: 12227398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multinational clinical validation study of PD ADEQUEST 2.0. PD ADEQUEST International Study Group.
Vonesh EF; Story KO; O'Neill WT
Perit Dial Int; 1999; 19(6):556-71. PubMed ID: 10641777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrafiltration and small solute transport at initiation of PD: questioning the paradigm of peritoneal function.
Selgas R; Bajo MA; Cirugeda A; del Peso G; Valdés J; Castro MJ; Sánchez S; Fernández-Reyes MJ; Hevia C; Gil F; Aguilera A; Ortiz J; Alegre L; Alvarez V; Sánchez-Tomero JA
Perit Dial Int; 2005; 25(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 15770928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The standard peritoneal permeability analysis in the rabbit: a longitudinal model for peritoneal dialysis.
Zweers MM; Douma CE; de Waart DR; van der Wardt AB; Ho-dac-Pannekeet MM; Krediet RT; Struijk DG
Perit Dial Int; 1999; 19(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 10201342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors influencing peritoneal transport parameters during the first year on peritoneal dialysis: peritonitis is the main factor.
del Peso G; Fernández-Reyes MJ; Hevia C; Bajo MA; Castro MJ; Cirugeda A; Sánchez-Tomero JA; Selgas R
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 Jun; 20(6):1201-6. PubMed ID: 15827050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peritoneal dialysis kinetic modeling: validation in a multicenter clinical study.
Vonesh EF; Burkart J; McMurray SD; Williams PF
Perit Dial Int; 1996; 16(5):471-81. PubMed ID: 8914177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Effect of using icodextrin as a starting therapy for peritoneal permeability].
Fernández-Reyes MJ; Bajo MA; del Peso G; Olea T; Sánchez-Villanueva RL; González E; Heras M; Sánchez R; Selgas R
Nefrologia; 2009; 29(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 19396318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of residual renal function on dietary protein and caloric intake in patients on incremental peritoneal dialysis.
Caravaca F; Arrobas M; Dominguez C
Perit Dial Int; 1999; 19(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 10507816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Volume-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription Guide to Achieve Adequacy Targets.
Akonur A; Firanek CA; Gellens ME; Hutchcraft AM; Kathuria P; Sloand JA
Perit Dial Int; 2016; 36(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 26293841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between 1.36% and 3.86% glucose dialysis solution for the assessment of peritoneal membrane function.
Smit W; Langedijk MJ; Schouten N; van den Berg N; Struijk DG; Krediet RT
Perit Dial Int; 2000; 20(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11216568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Peritoneal transport in peritoneal dialysis patients is not affected by transitorily successful renal transplantation.
Fernández EJ; del Peso G; Bajo A; Jiménez C; de Gracia R; Ros S; Selgas R
Adv Perit Dial; 2006; 22():33-6. PubMed ID: 16983935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peritoneal function and assessment of reference values using a 3.86% glucose solution.
Smit W; van Dijk P; Langedijk MJ; Schouten N; van den Berg N; Struijk DG; Krediet RT
Perit Dial Int; 2003; 23(5):440-9. PubMed ID: 14604195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a 2.5% and a 4.25% dextrose peritoneal equilibration test.
Pride ET; Gustafson J; Graham A; Spainhour L; Mauck V; Brown P; Burkart JM
Perit Dial Int; 2002; 22(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 12227395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of peritoneal transport rate, inflammation, and fluid removal on nutritional status and clinical outcome in prevalent peritoneal dialysis patients.
Chung SH; Heimbürger O; Stenvinkel P; Wang T; Lindholm B
Perit Dial Int; 2003; 23(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 12713086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adverse effect of peritonitis on peritoneal membrane function in children on dialysis.
Andreoli SP; Leiser J; Warady BA; Schlichting L; Brewer ED; Watkins SL
Pediatr Nephrol; 1999 Jan; 13(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10100281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the PD adequest program in Japanese patients on peritoneal dialysis.
Katsutani M; Yorioka N; Ito T; Naito T; Kanahara K; Oda H; Yamakido M
Int J Artif Organs; 1999 Sep; 22(9):600-3. PubMed ID: 10532428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nutritional markers during peritoneal dialysis: data from the 1998 Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study.
Flanigan MJ; Frankenfield DL; Prowant BF; Bailie GR; Frederick PR; Rocco MV
Perit Dial Int; 2001; 21(4):345-54. PubMed ID: 11587396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical validation of PD Adequest software: modeling error assessment.
Amici G; Mastrosimone S; Da Rin G; Bocci C; Bonadonna A
Perit Dial Int; 1998; 18(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9663897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effluent CA 125 concentration in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients: influence of PD duration, peritoneal transport and PD regimen.
Fusshöller A; Grabensee B; Plum J
Kidney Blood Press Res; 2003; 26(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 12771537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adequacy and nutrition in pediatric peritoneal dialysis.
Cano FJ; Marín VS; Azocar MA; Delucchi MA; Rodriguez EE; Diaz ED; Villegas RC
Adv Perit Dial; 2003; 19():273-8. PubMed ID: 14763078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
