116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12227609)
1. Identification of the source of faecal pollution in contaminated rivers.
Glipin BJ; Gregor JE; Savill MG
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(3):9-15. PubMed ID: 12227609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of chemical and molecular microbial indicators for faecal source identification.
Gilpin B; James T; Nourozi F; Saunders D; Scholes P; Savill M
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(3):39-43. PubMed ID: 12639003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tracking the origin of faecal pollution in surface water: an ongoing project within the European Union research programme.
Blanch AR; Belanche-Muñoz L; Bonjoch X; Ebdon J; Gantzer C; Lucena F; Ottoson J; Kourtis C; Iversen A; Kühn I; Moce L; Muniesa M; Schwartzbrod J; Skraber S; Papageorgiou G; Taylor HD; Wallis J; Jofre J
J Water Health; 2004 Dec; 2(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 15666966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating potential applications of faecal sterols in distinguishing sources of faecal contamination from mixed faecal samples.
Shah VG; Dunstan RH; Geary PM; Coombes P; Roberts TK; Von Nagy-Felsobuki E
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3691-700. PubMed ID: 17614115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chemometric approach to validating faecal sterols as source tracer for faecal contamination in water.
Saim N; Osman R; Sari Abg Spian DR; Jaafar MZ; Juahir H; Abdullah MP; Ghani FA
Water Res; 2009 Dec; 43(20):5023-30. PubMed ID: 19896157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Faecal sterols analysis for the identification of human faecal pollution in a non-sewered catchment.
Sullivan D; Brooks P; Tindale N; Chapman S; Ahmed W
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1355-61. PubMed ID: 20220257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Faecal sterols determination in wastewater and surface water.
Gilli G; Rovere R; Traversi D; Schilirò T; Pignata C
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2006 Oct; 843(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 16787764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of faecal pollutants in Torrens and Patawalonga catchment waters in South Australia using faecal sterols.
Suprihatin I; Fallowfield H; Bentham R; Cromar N
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):283-9. PubMed ID: 12793691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bacterial source tracking from diverse land use catchments by sterol ratios.
Shah VG; Hugh Dunstan R; Geary PM; Coombes P; Roberts TK; Rothkirch T
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3667-74. PubMed ID: 17433407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sterols as bio-markers for waste impact and source characterization in stream sediment.
Ayebo A; Breuer GM; Cain TG; Wichman MD; Subramanian P; Reynolds SJ
J Environ Health; 2006 Jun; 68(10):46-50. PubMed ID: 16780001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enumeration of bifidobacterial populations with selective media to determine the source of waterborne fecal pollution.
Bonjoch X; Ballesté E; Blanch AR
Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(8):1621-7. PubMed ID: 15878035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of sterol profiles, supported with other faecal source tracking methods, to apportion septic tanks contamination in rural catchments.
Dubber D; Brophy L; O'Connell D; Behan P; Danaher M; Evans C; Geary P; Misstear B; Gill L
Environ Pollut; 2024 Jan; 341():122884. PubMed ID: 37951526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The application of a recently isolated strain of Bacteroides (GB-124) to identify human sources of faecal pollution in a temperate river catchment.
Ebdon J; Muniesa M; Taylor H
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3683-90. PubMed ID: 17275065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying avian sources of faecal contamination using sterol analysis.
Devane ML; Wood D; Chappell A; Robson B; Webster-Brown J; Gilpin BJ
Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Oct; 187(10):625. PubMed ID: 26370196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bifidobacterial survival in surface water and implications for microbial source tracking.
Ottoson JR
Can J Microbiol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19767833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationships between chemical and microbial faecal source tracking markers in urban river water and sediments during and post-discharge of human sewage.
Devane ML; Moriarty EM; Robson B; Lin S; Wood D; Webster-Brown J; Gilpin BJ
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 651(Pt 1):1588-1604. PubMed ID: 30360285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A PCR marker for detection in surface waters of faecal pollution derived from ducks.
Devane ML; Robson B; Nourozi F; Scholes P; Gilpin BJ
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3553-60. PubMed ID: 17631940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Farmyards, an overlooked source for highly contaminated runoff.
Edwards AC; Kay D; McDonald AT; Francis C; Watkins J; Wilkinson JR; Wyer MD
J Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 87(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 18179860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of rainfall on the incidence of microbial faecal indicators and the dominant sources of faecal pollution in a Florida river.
Shehane SD; Harwood VJ; Whitlock JE; Rose JB
J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(5):1127-36. PubMed ID: 15836482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Population similarity analysis of indicator bacteria for source prediction of faecal pollution in a coastal lake.
Ahmed W; Hargreaves M; Goonetilleke A; Katouli M
Mar Pollut Bull; 2008 Aug; 56(8):1469-75. PubMed ID: 18561957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
