114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12227998)
1. The effects of topological inaccuracy in evolutionary trees on the phylogenetic comparative method of independent contrasts.
Symonds MR
Syst Biol; 2002 Aug; 51(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 12227998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics.
Antezana M
J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring the relationship between sequence similarity and accurate phylogenetic trees.
Cantarel BL; Morrison HG; Pearson W
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Nov; 23(11):2090-100. PubMed ID: 16891377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the relative merits of a few methods to detect evolutionary trends.
Laurin M
Syst Biol; 2010 Dec; 59(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 20937759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test.
Martins EP; Diniz-Filho JA; Housworth EA
Evolution; 2002 Jan; 56(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11913655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failed refutations: further comments on parsimony and likelihood methods and their relationship to Popper's degree of corroboration.
de Queiroz K; Poe S
Syst Biol; 2003 Jun; 52(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 12775524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simulation test of Smith's "Degrees of freedom" correction for comparative studies.
Nunn CL
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1995 Nov; 98(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 8572158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers.
Carstens BC; Knowles LL
Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17520504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree.
Gadagkar SR; Rosenberg MS; Kumar S
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2005 Jan; 304(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 15593277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of intraspecific sample size on type I and type II error rates in comparative studies.
Harmon LJ; Losos JB
Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2705-10. PubMed ID: 16526516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distinguishing terminal monophyletic groups from reticulate taxa: performance of phenetic, tree-based, and network procedures.
Reeves PA; Richards CM
Syst Biol; 2007 Apr; 56(2):302-20. PubMed ID: 17464885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Euclidean nature of phylogenetic distance matrices.
de Vienne DM; Aguileta G; Ollier S
Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 60(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 21804094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rate asymmetry after genome duplication causes substantial long-branch attraction artifacts in the phylogeny of Saccharomyces species.
Fares MA; Byrne KP; Wolfe KH
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Feb; 23(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 16207937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficiencies of maximum likelihood methods of phylogenetic inferences when different substitution models are used.
Piontkivska H
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Jun; 31(3):865-73. PubMed ID: 15120384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised.
Felsenstein J
Am Nat; 2008 Jun; 171(6):713-25. PubMed ID: 18419518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology.
Garland T; Bennett AF; Rezende EL
J Exp Biol; 2005 Aug; 208(Pt 16):3015-35. PubMed ID: 16081601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does gene flow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene flow.
Eckert AJ; Carstens BC
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Dec; 49(3):832-42. PubMed ID: 18845264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions.
Liu L; Pearl DK
Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):504-14. PubMed ID: 17562474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiple sequence alignment accuracy and phylogenetic inference.
Ogden TH; Rosenberg MS
Syst Biol; 2006 Apr; 55(2):314-28. PubMed ID: 16611602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of whole prokaryotic phylogeny by the development of a random extraction method.
Saruhashi S; Hamada K; Horiike T; Shinozawa T
Gene; 2007 May; 392(1-2):157-63. PubMed ID: 17275216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
