These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1222844)
1. [Two years use of IUD copper T 200]. Cohen J; Viollet MR Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1975 Oct; 3(6):373-6. PubMed ID: 1222844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical study of a copper IUD, T Cu 200]. Viollet MF; Cohen J; Merger R Gynecologie; 1975 Jan; 26(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 1095434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Copper intrauterine device use by nulliparous women: review of side effects. Hubacher D Contraception; 2007 Jun; 75(6 Suppl):S8-11. PubMed ID: 17531622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception. Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative study of the T delta IUD and the copper T 220 in Costa Rica]. Aranda Meléndez C; Waszak CS; Colven CE Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1986 Jul; 54():164-7. PubMed ID: 3527876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Contraception with intrauterine devices. Parr EL Bioscience; 1973 May; 23(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 4803454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation from various viewpoints of the Lippes Loop, Multiload Cu 250 and Nova T]. Bilgin S; Deger S; Ariduru F Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(14):893-8. PubMed ID: 3176743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tatum T: experience with 3,000 patients. Williamson HO; Bank HL; Kirkland BH Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 789154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Experience with the T-CU 200 and 300 intrauterine devices]. Fugère P; Girard Y; Lemay M Union Med Can; 1976 Nov; 105(11):1717-20. PubMed ID: 982699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Intrauterine contraception with copper-T. An investigation with attention to employment of this device among nulliparas and multiparas]. Hansen MK; Honoré E Ugeskr Laeger; 1976 May; 138(19):1139-42. PubMed ID: 1265913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficiency and acceptability of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Trutko NS Acta Med Hung; 1986; 43(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 3588154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Intrauterine contraception as a valid alternative]. Di Felice F Aggiorn Ostet Ginecol; 1977; 10(5):387-95. PubMed ID: 12261997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-year evaluation of the Spring Coil IUD in Rijeka, Yugoslavia, and Cairo, Egypt. Randic L; Ragab I; Thomas M; Kessel E; Bernard RP Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 1234074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Management of abnormal bleeding in an intrauterine device user]. Desmons F; Adam-steen C Cah Sexol Clin; 1985; 11(63):185-7. PubMed ID: 12281357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The TCu380 IUD: initial international experimental results with the latest "T" family IUD]. Elia D; Belaisch J Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1985 Sep; 13(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 12267501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Intrauterine contraceptive devices containing copper, the combined multiload copper IUD (MLCu 250)]. van Os WA; Thiery M; van der Pas H; Haspels AA; Rhemrev PE; Lo Sin Sjoe E; Loendersloot EW Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1977 Apr; 121(14):568-71. PubMed ID: 854094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]