297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12230850)
1. Patenting DNA: who defines and protects the public good?
Garcia SA
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):25-6. PubMed ID: 12230850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How can you patent genes?
Eisenberg RS
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):3-11. PubMed ID: 12230840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The gene patenting controversy: a convergence of law, economic interests, and ethics.
Kevles DJ; Berkowitz A
Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 12645549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The unexamined assumptions of intellectual property: adopting an evaluative approach to patenting biotechnological innovation.
Gold ER; Adams W; Castle D; de Langavant GC; Cloutier LM; Daar AS; Glass A; Smith PJ; Bernier L
Public Aff Q; 2004 Oct; 18(4):299-344. PubMed ID: 15812959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patenting genes and the public interest.
Nelkin D
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):13-5. PubMed ID: 12230842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Patenting genes? A finger in the dike of a bricks-and-mortar patent system.
White GB
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):20. PubMed ID: 12230846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rights to life? On nature, property and biotechnology.
Meyer JM
J Polit Philos; 2000 Jun; 8(2):154-75. PubMed ID: 15586933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Waiting on science: the stake of present and future patients.
Quigley RB
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):17-8. PubMed ID: 12230844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Monsters at the patent office: the inconsistent conclusions of moral utility and the controversy of human cloning.
Smith AR
De Paul Law Rev; 2003; 53(1):159-203. PubMed ID: 15568254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Patenting and ethics--a dubious connection.
Crespi RS
J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 2003 Jan; 85(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 15212036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patentable subject matter, TRIPS and the European Biotechnology Directive: Australia and patenting human genes.
Palombi L
Univ N S W Law J; 2003; 26(3):782-92. PubMed ID: 16617532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The two meanings of how and the gene patenting debate.
Evans JH
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 12230851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patenting life.
Washington Post; 1980 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US Supreme Court may have to settle dispute over patenting DNA sequences.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d6187. PubMed ID: 21952463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents.
Robertson D
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):639. PubMed ID: 12089532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patents. Signature on visitor's form fuels Stanford v. Roche court battle.
Marshall E
Science; 2011 Apr; 332(6026):163. PubMed ID: 21474725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Religious voices in biotechnology: the case of gene patenting.
Hanson MJ
Genetic Resour; 1999; 12(1-2):5-22. PubMed ID: 12962106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A modest proposal: toward improved access to biotechnology research tools by implementing a broad experimental use exception.
Hoffman DC
Cornell Law Rev; 2004 May; 89(4):993-1043. PubMed ID: 15174465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An historical development of patenting microorganisms and genetically engineered animals in the USA and Europe.
McTaggart RJ
Eur J Genet Soc; 1996; 2(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 11658254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioprospecting, genetic patenting and indigenous populations: challenges under a restructured information commons.
Faye DJ
J World Intellect Prop; 2004 May; 7(3):401-28. PubMed ID: 16755699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
