These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12230858)
1. Who are the guardians guarding? Trachtman H Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):46-8. PubMed ID: 12230858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Cipro patent and bioterrorism. Kaye KS; Kaye D Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):41-2. PubMed ID: 12230854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bioterrorism and patent rights: "compulsory licensure" and the case of Cipro. Resnik DB; DeVille KA Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):29-39. PubMed ID: 12230852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Compulsory licensure: the case of Cipro and beyond. Chakrabarty AM Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):40. PubMed ID: 12230853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond government intervention: drug companies and bioethics. Dresser R Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):42-3. PubMed ID: 12230855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Not taking, just borrowing: government use of patented drugs. Ossorio PN Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):51-2. PubMed ID: 12230861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. It is not unethical, though it is often unwise, to override patents. Leventer H Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):50-1. PubMed ID: 12230860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patents: the public interest versus the private privilege. Parsi KP; Egan EA Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):45-6. PubMed ID: 12230857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Life, death, and monopoly rights in a democratic society. Smith SJ Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):43-4. PubMed ID: 12230856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioterrorism, public health, and international law. Fidler DP Chic J Int Law; 2002; 3(1):7-26. PubMed ID: 15709296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patent immorality? Bloche MG; Jungman ER Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):48-9. PubMed ID: 12230859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The burgeoning science of genetics and the impact on public policy. Hatch OG J Biolaw Bus; 2004; 7(4):3-6. PubMed ID: 15675088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response to commentaries : Resnik, D. B. and K. A. DeVille. 2002. "Bioterrorism and patient rights: 'compulsory licensure' and the case of Cipro." The American Journal of Bioethics 2(3): 29-39. Resnik DB; DeVille KA Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(4):W1. PubMed ID: 12816075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioterrorism, public health, and civil liberties. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2002 Apr; 346(17):1337-42. PubMed ID: 11973377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. US policy may encourage counterfeit drugs. Bouchie A Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Feb; 21(2):121. PubMed ID: 12560826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning. Doerflinger RM Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomedical patents and the public's health: is there a role for eminent domain? Kesselheim AS; Avorn J JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(4):434-7. PubMed ID: 16434634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]