These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12232885)
1. Compliance with recommendations of the urodynamic society for standards of efficacy for evaluation of treatment outcomes in urinary incontinence. Lee RS; DeAntoni E; Daneshgari F Neurourol Urodyn; 2002; 21(5):482-5. PubMed ID: 12232885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adherence to the 1997 American Urological Association guidelines for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Rovner ES; Wright CJ; Messer H Urology; 2008 Feb; 71(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 18308092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Canadian Urological Association guidelines on urinary incontinence. Corcos J; Gajewski J; Heritz D; Patrick A; Reid I; Schick E; Stothers L; Can J Urol; 2006 Jun; 13(3):3127-38. PubMed ID: 16813704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urinary Incontinence Research: Compliance With Research Standards for Clinical Studies. Tuong MNE; Patel NA; Zillioux JM; Rapp DE Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():55-59. PubMed ID: 31794811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Urodynamic evaluation of sacral neuromodulation for urge urinary incontinence. Groenendijk PM; Lycklama à Nyeholt AA; Heesakkers JP; van Kerrebroeck PE; Hassouna MM; Gajewski JB; Cappellano F; Siegel SW; Fall M; Dijkema HE; Jonas U; van den Hombergh U; BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 18070199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Self-reported urinary incontinence, voiding frequency, voided volume and pad-test results: variables in a prospective study in children. Bael AM; Lax H; Hirche H; Gäbel E; Winkler P; Hellström AL; van Zon R; Janhsen E; Güntek S; Renson C; van Gool JD; BJU Int; 2007 Sep; 100(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 17488303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Urinary incontinence management in women: audit in general practice. Gerrits M; Avery T; Lagro-Janssen A J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):836-8. PubMed ID: 19018916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adherence to professional guidelines for patients with urinary incontinence by general practitioners: a cross-sectional study. Albers-Heitner P; Berghmans B; Nieman F; Lagro-Janssen T; Winkens R J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):807-11. PubMed ID: 18462277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review. Lapitan MC; Cody JD; Grant A Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(6):472-80. PubMed ID: 19591206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Recommendations for the urodynamic examination in the investigation of non-neurological female urinary incontinence]. Hermieu JF; Prog Urol; 2007 Nov; 17(6 Suppl 2):1264-84. PubMed ID: 18214138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of urinary incontinence in Medicare managed care beneficiaries: results from the 2004 Medicare Health Outcomes Survey. Mardon RE; Halim S; Pawlson LG; Haffer SC Arch Intern Med; 2006 May; 166(10):1128-33. PubMed ID: 16717176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Could the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines on urodynamics in urinary incontinence put some women at risk of a bad outcome from stress incontinence surgery? Agur W; Housami F; Drake M; Abrams P BJU Int; 2009 Mar; 103(5):635-9. PubMed ID: 19021606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The evaluation and treatment of female urinary incontinence--a comparison of clinical practice in the Republic of Ireland with the recommendations of the International Continence Society. Agnew G; Byrne P Ir Med J; 2004 Sep; 97(8):238-40. PubMed ID: 15532970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. Cookson MS; Aus G; Burnett AL; Canby-Hagino ED; D'Amico AV; Dmochowski RR; Eton DT; Forman JD; Goldenberg SL; Hernandez J; Higano CS; Kraus SR; Moul JW; Tangen C; Thrasher JB; Thompson I J Urol; 2007 Feb; 177(2):540-5. PubMed ID: 17222629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of North American urodynamic centers: measuring lower urinary tract filling and storage function. Gray M; Krissovich M Urol Nurs; 2004 Feb; 24(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 15054908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do clinical or urodynamic parameters predict artificial urinary sphincter outcome in post-radical prostatectomy incontinence? Thiel DD; Young PR; Broderick GA; Heckman MG; Wehle MJ; Igel TC; Petrou SP Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):315-9. PubMed ID: 17320671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective study evaluating the efficacy of the artificial sphincter AMS 800 for the treatment of postradical prostatectomy urinary incontinence and the correlation between preoperative urodynamic and surgical outcomes. Trigo Rocha F; Gomes CM; Mitre AI; Arap S; Srougi M Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 18242371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between urinary symptoms reported in a postal questionnaire and urodynamic diagnosis. Matharu G; Donaldson MM; McGrother CW; Matthews RJ Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 15605372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance improvement in practice: managing urinary incontinence in home health patients with the use of an evidence-based guideline. Egnatios D; Dupree L; Williams C Home Healthc Nurse; 2010; 28(10):620-8; quiz 629-31. PubMed ID: 21057232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]