These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12233015)
1. Towards 'Star Wars' technology. Wear JO Health Estate; 2002 Aug; 56(7):37-9. PubMed ID: 12233015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The changing face of health technology assessment. Hillman BJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):289. PubMed ID: 19394565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of federal programs in the transfer of biomedical technology. Phillips SJ Artif Organs; 2004 May; 28(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 15113335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Introduction: health technology assessment in diagnostic imaging. Carlos RC; Goeree R J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):297-8. PubMed ID: 19394569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrating new technology without going broke. Starr C State Health Care Am; 2002; ():29-34. PubMed ID: 12235761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Computers that think. Cross M Health Data Manag; 1999 Feb; 7(2):146-8, 150-1. PubMed ID: 10346130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Public attitudes to nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Gaskell G; Ten Eyck T; Jackson J; Veltri G Nat Mater; 2004 Aug; 3(8):496. PubMed ID: 15286746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing health technology assessment. Sinclair A CMAJ; 2001 Jun; 164(13):1881. PubMed ID: 11450288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Striking a balance on new technology. Cost-effectiveness analysis can help sort out emerging health care technologies, but what are the consequences for continued medical innovation? Philipson TJ; Jena AB AHIP Cover; 2006; 47(5):29, 31, 33. PubMed ID: 17007325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Take the time. Hill RA Health Forum J; 2002; 45(5):3. PubMed ID: 12373966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Shrinking technology. Nanotechnology holds the promise of spectacular medical advances, including a cure for cancer, but critics warn of dire consequences. Mantone J Mod Healthc; 2003 Dec; 33(49):32-3, 35. PubMed ID: 14712601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Written in the stars. Introducing our five-star rating system. Health Devices; 2010 Mar; 39(3):73. PubMed ID: 21309267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health technology slide shows. Web feature gets down to basics. Health Devices; 2003 Mar; 32(3):126-7. PubMed ID: 12751149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Technology strategy and the balance sheet: 3 points to consider. Waldron DJ Healthc Financ Manage; 2005 May; 59(5):70-6. PubMed ID: 15938352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. To use technology better. Garber AM Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(2):w51-3. PubMed ID: 16464903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The next little thing. Weber DO Health Forum J; 2002; 45(5):10-5, 1. PubMed ID: 12373963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why advances in imaging technology are good for radiology, patients, and the bottom line. Seshadri S J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 17411752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation oncology health technology assessment: the best is the enemy of the good. Bentzen SM Nat Clin Pract Oncol; 2008 Oct; 5(10):563. PubMed ID: 18818689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nanotechnology slowly gives up its secrets. Barrera M Occup Health Saf; 2006 May; 75(5):60, 62-4, 112-3. PubMed ID: 16734287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]