These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12233955)
1. The SF-12 in the Australian population: cross-validation of item selection. Sanderson K; Andrews G Aust N Z J Public Health; 2002 Aug; 26(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 12233955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Gandek B; Ware JE; Aaronson NK; Apolone G; Bjorner JB; Brazier JE; Bullinger M; Kaasa S; Leplege A; Prieto L; Sullivan M J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):1171-8. PubMed ID: 9817135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement properties and normative data for the Norwegian SF-36: results from a general population survey. Garratt AM; Stavem K Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Mar; 15(1):51. PubMed ID: 28292292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The SF-36 in an Australian sample: validating a new, generic health status measure. McCallum J Aust J Public Health; 1995 Apr; 19(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 7786942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The SF-36 summary scales: problems and solutions. Wilson D; Parsons J; Tucker G Soz Praventivmed; 2000; 45(6):239-46. PubMed ID: 11210594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The SF-36 physical and mental health summary measures: an example of how to interpret scores. Jenkinson C J Health Serv Res Policy; 1998 Apr; 3(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 10180668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Methodological views on the SF-36 summary scores based on the adult German population]. Ellert U; Kurth BM Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2004 Nov; 47(11):1027-32. PubMed ID: 15549195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in ten countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Keller SD; Ware JE; Bentler PM; Aaronson NK; Alonso J; Apolone G; Bjorner JB; Brazier J; Bullinger M; Kaasa S; Leplège A; Sullivan M; Gandek B J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):1179-88. PubMed ID: 9817136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensionality and summary measures of the SF-36 v1.6: comparison of scale- and item-based approach across ECRHS II adults population. Grassi M; Nucera A; Value Health; 2010; 13(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 20088893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A brief integer scorer for the SF-12: validity of the brief scorer in Australian community and clinic settings. Andrews G Aust N Z J Public Health; 2002 Dec; 26(6):508-10. PubMed ID: 12530792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rethinking and rescoring the SF-12. Wilson D; Tucker G; Chittleborough C Soz Praventivmed; 2002; 47(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12238299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The validity of the SF-36 in an Australian National Household Survey: demonstrating the applicability of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to examination of health inequalities. Butterworth P; Crosier T BMC Public Health; 2004 Oct; 4():44. PubMed ID: 15469617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deriving SF-12v2 physical and mental health summary scores: a comparison of different scoring algorithms. Fleishman JA; Selim AJ; Kazis LE Qual Life Res; 2010 Mar; 19(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 20094805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Australian health-related quality of life population norms derived from the SF-6D. Norman R; Church J; van den Berg B; Goodall S Aust N Z J Public Health; 2013 Feb; 37(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 23379801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New Australian population scoring coefficients for the old version of the SF-36 and SF-12 health status questionnaires. Tucker G; Adams R; Wilson D Qual Life Res; 2010 Sep; 19(7):1069-76. PubMed ID: 20440565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability. Kosinski M; Keller SD; Hatoum HT; Kong SX; Ware JE Med Care; 1999 May; 37(5 Suppl):MS10-22. PubMed ID: 10335740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring physical and mental health using the SF-12: implications for community surveys of mental health. Windsor TD; Rodgers B; Butterworth P; Anstey KJ; Jorm AF Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2006 Sep; 40(9):797-803. PubMed ID: 16911756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mental health status of the South Australian population. Taylor AW; Wilson DH; Dal Grande E; Ben-Tovim D; Elzinga RH; Goldney RD; MacFarlane AC; Cheok F; Kirke K Aust N Z J Public Health; 2000 Feb; 24(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 10777975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The SF-12 as a population health measure: an exploratory examination of potential for application. Burdine JN; Felix MR; Abel AL; Wiltraut CJ; Musselman YJ Health Serv Res; 2000 Oct; 35(4):885-904. PubMed ID: 11055454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Observed agreement problems between sub-scales and summary components of the SF-36 version 2 - an alternative scoring method can correct the problem. Tucker G; Adams R; Wilson D PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61191. PubMed ID: 23593428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]