These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12234090)

  • 21. Are the hierarchical properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale the same in acute stroke and chronic stroke?
    Crow JL; Kwakkel G; Bussmann JB; Goos JA; Harmeling-van der Wel BC;
    Phys Ther; 2014 Jul; 94(7):977-86. PubMed ID: 24677254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the upper limb subscale of the Motor Assessment Scale (UL-MAS) in adults following stroke.
    Lannin N
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Jan; 26(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 14668148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Upper Limb Functional Index: development and determination of reliability, validity, and responsiveness.
    Gabel CP; Michener LA; Burkett B; Neller A
    J Hand Ther; 2006; 19(3):328-48; quiz 349. PubMed ID: 16861132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke.
    Rabadi MH; Rabadi FM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 87(7):962-6. PubMed ID: 16813784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke.
    Page SJ; Fulk GD; Boyne P
    Phys Ther; 2012 Jun; 92(6):791-8. PubMed ID: 22282773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wu CY; Huang PC; Chen YT; Lin KC; Yang HW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Jun; 94(6):1023-30. PubMed ID: 23419791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measurement properties of the Motor Evaluation Scale for Upper Extremity in Stroke patients (MESUPES).
    Johansson GM; Häger CK
    Disabil Rehabil; 2012; 34(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 21981318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients.
    Hsieh CL; Hsueh IP; Chiang FM; Lin PH
    Age Ageing; 1998 Mar; 27(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 16296669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the upper limb subscales of the Motor Assessment Scale using a Rasch analysis model.
    Miller KJ; Slade AL; Pallant JF; Galea MP
    J Rehabil Med; 2010 Apr; 42(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 20461333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Jacket Test for assessing people with chronic stroke.
    Chen P; Lai CKY; Chung RCK; Ng SSM
    Disabil Rehabil; 2017 Dec; 39(25):2577-2583. PubMed ID: 27793076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Novel neuromuscular electrical stimulation system for the upper limbs in chronic stroke patients: a feasibility study.
    Noma T; Matsumoto S; Shimodozono M; Iwase Y; Kawahira K
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 93(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 24508928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: The Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test.
    Nijland R; van Wegen E; Verbunt J; van Wijk R; van Kordelaar J; Kwakkel G
    J Rehabil Med; 2010 Jul; 42(7):694-6. PubMed ID: 20603702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measuring upper limb capacity in poststroke patients: development, fit of the monotone homogeneity model, unidimensionality, fit of the double monotonicity model, differential item functioning, internal consistency, and feasibility of the stroke upper limb capacity scale, SULCS.
    Roorda LD; Houwink A; Smits W; Molenaar IW; Geurts AC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 92(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 21272717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Qualities of a French version of the Wolf Motor Function Test: a multicenter study.
    Bürge E; Kupper D; Badan Bâ M; Leemann B; Berchtold A
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2013 May; 56(4):288-99. PubMed ID: 23602342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke.
    Wolf SL; Catlin PA; Ellis M; Archer AL; Morgan B; Piacentino A
    Stroke; 2001 Jul; 32(7):1635-9. PubMed ID: 11441212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hierarchical properties of the motor function sections of the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale for people after stroke: a retrospective study.
    Crow JL; Harmeling-van der Wel BC
    Phys Ther; 2008 Dec; 88(12):1554-67. PubMed ID: 18927197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability and validity of the Manual Function Test in patients with stroke.
    Miyamoto S; Kondo T; Suzukamo Y; Michimata A; Izumi S
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Mar; 88(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 19106794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Pilot Study for Remote Evaluation of Upper Extremity Motor Function After Stroke: The Arm Capacity and Movement Test (ArmCAM).
    Yang CL; Simpson LA; Eng JJ
    Am J Occup Ther; 2023 Jan; 77(1):. PubMed ID: 36706274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (stream) instrument.
    Wang CH; Hsieh CL; Dai MH; Chen CH; Lai YF
    J Rehabil Med; 2002 Jan; 34(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 11900258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reaching performance scale for stroke - Test-retest reliability, measurement error, concurrent and discriminant validity.
    Subramanian SK; Baniña MC; Turolla A; Levin MF
    PM R; 2022 Mar; 14(3):337-347. PubMed ID: 33675151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.