909 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12234231)
1. Effectiveness of nurses as providers of birth labor support in North American hospitals: a randomized controlled trial.
Hodnett ED; Lowe NK; Hannah ME; Willan AR; Stevens B; Weston JA; Ohlsson A; Gafni A; Muir HA; Myhr TL; Stremler R;
JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(11):1373-81. PubMed ID: 12234231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variation in Cesarean Birth Rates by Labor and Delivery Nurses.
Edmonds JK; O'Hara M; Clarke SP; Shah NT
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2017; 46(4):486-493. PubMed ID: 28549612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.
Carlson NS; Corwin EJ; Hernandez TL; Holt E; Lowe NK; Hurt KJ
Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):159-168. PubMed ID: 29388247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for women in spontaneous labor with a twin pregnancy: A secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study.
Mei-Dan E; Dougan C; Melamed N; Asztalos EV; Aviram A; Willan AR; Barrett JFR
Birth; 2019 Mar; 46(1):193-200. PubMed ID: 30073688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical trial of active management of labor.
Frigoletto FD; Lieberman E; Lang JM; Cohen A; Barss V; Ringer S; Datta S
N Engl J Med; 1995 Sep; 333(12):745-50. PubMed ID: 7643880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines.
Gimovsky AC; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):361.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26928148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Labor Nurses' Views of Their Influence on Cesarean Birth.
Simpson KR; Lyndon A
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2017; 42(2):81-87. PubMed ID: 27879502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Continuity of nursing care and its link to cesarean birth rate.
Gagnon AJ; Meier KM; Waghorn K
Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 17324175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009.
Cheyney M; Bovbjerg M; Everson C; Gordon W; Hannibal D; Vedam S
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 24479690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect on birth outcomes of a formalised approach to care in hospital labour assessment units: international, randomised controlled trial.
Hodnett ED; Stremler R; Willan AR; Weston JA; Lowe NK; Simpson KR; Fraser WD; Gafni A;
BMJ; 2008 Aug; 337():a1021. PubMed ID: 18755762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Birth Outcomes of Women with Obesity Enrolled for Care at Freestanding Birth Centers in the United States.
Jevitt CM; Stapleton S; Deng Y; Song X; Wang K; Jolles DR
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2021 Jan; 66(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 33377279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.
Nippita TA; Lee YY; Patterson JA; Ford JB; Morris JM; Nicholl MC; Roberts CL
BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):702-11. PubMed ID: 25605625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trial of Labor Compared With Cesarean Delivery in Superobese Women.
Grasch JL; Thompson JL; Newton JM; Zhai AW; Osmundson SS
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):994-1000. PubMed ID: 29016512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery.
Kashanian M; Javadi F; Haghighi MM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Jun; 109(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 20152972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of collaborative management and early admission in labor on method of delivery.
Jackson DJ; Lang JM; Ecker J; Swartz WH; Heeren T
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2003; 32(2):147-57; discussion 158-60. PubMed ID: 12685666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Racial disparities in outcomes of twin pregnancies: elective cesarean or trial of labor?
Drassinower D; Timofeev J; Huang CC; Landy HJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 211(2):160.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24534184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Likelihood of cesarean birth among parous women after applying leading active labor diagnostic guidelines.
Neal JL; Lowe NK; Phillippi JC; Carlson NS; Knupp AM; Dietrich MS
Midwifery; 2018 Dec; 67():64-69. PubMed ID: 30253316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Gienger A; Cheng YW; McDonald KM; Shaffer BL; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 151(4):252-63, W53-63. PubMed ID: 19687492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maternal Morbidity and Birth Satisfaction After Implementation of a Validated Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery During Labor Induction.
Hamm RF; McCoy J; Oladuja A; Bogner HR; Elovitz MA; Morales KH; Srinivas SK; Levine LD
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2025582. PubMed ID: 33185679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The REDUCED trial: a cluster randomized trial for REDucing the utilization of CEsarean delivery for dystocia.
Wood S; Skiffington J; Brant R; Crawford S; Hicks M; Mohammad K; Mrklas KJ; Tang S; Metcalfe A;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 May; 228(5S):S1095-S1103. PubMed ID: 37164490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
