These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. [Diagnosis and treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction caused by renal crossing vessels:an analysis of 24 cases]. Qiu M; Wu H; Ma L; Lu J; Huang Y; Li G; Yan Y; Li H Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 52(9):702-5. PubMed ID: 25410785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed open surgery. Basiri A; Behjati S; Zand S; Moghaddam SM J Endourol; 2007 Sep; 21(9):1045-51; discussion 1051. PubMed ID: 17941785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Based on Degree of Obstruction on Preoperative Tc-99 MAG-3 Renal Scintigraphy. Zappia JL; Farrow JM; Song L; Peters AW; Fennerty ML; Sundaram CP; Boris RS J Endourol; 2023 Feb; 37(2):151-156. PubMed ID: 36254381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A modified technique of paraumbilical three-port laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for infants and children. Cao H; Zhou H; Liu K; Ma L; Liu D; Tao T; Luo X; Cheng W Pediatr Surg Int; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1037-1045. PubMed ID: 27567622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with horseshoe kidney. Blanc T; Koulouris E; Botto N; Paye-Jaouen A; El-Ghoneimi A J Urol; 2014 Apr; 191(4):1097-103. PubMed ID: 24140844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transposition and fixation of lower pole crossing vessel in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A STROBE-compliant study. Sizonov VV; Shidaev AH; Mayr JM; Kogan MI; Kagantsov IM; Rostovskaya VV Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Dec; 100(51):e28235. PubMed ID: 34941091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Further experience with the vascular hitch (laparoscopic transposition of lower pole crossing vessels): an alternate treatment for pediatric ureterovascular ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Gundeti MS; Reynolds WS; Duffy PG; Mushtaq I J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1832-6; discussion 1836. PubMed ID: 18721979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient. Casale P; Grady RW; Joyner BD; Zeltser IS; Figueroa TE; Mitchell ME J Endourol; 2004 Nov; 18(9):875-8. PubMed ID: 15659924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiation-free monitoring in the long-term follow-up of pyeloplasty: Are ultrasound new parameters good enough to evaluate a successful procedure? Fernández-Ibieta M; Nortes-Cano L; Guirao-Piñera MJ; Zambudio-Carmona G; Ruiz-Jiménez JI J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):230.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27318545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Endopyelotomy review. Bernardo N; Smith AD Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Jun; 52(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 10427896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in a child with a relatively inaccessible intrarenal pelvis. Lintula H; Kokki H Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2011; 8(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 22005372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]