These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12234798)

  • 1. Influence of hemodynamic conditions on fractional flow reserve: parametric analysis of underlying model.
    Siebes M; Chamuleau SA; Meuwissen M; Piek JJ; Spaan JA
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2002 Oct; 283(4):H1462-70. PubMed ID: 12234798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calculation of the index of microcirculatory resistance without coronary wedge pressure measurement in the presence of epicardial stenosis.
    Yong AS; Layland J; Fearon WF; Ho M; Shah MG; Daniels D; Whitbourn R; Macisaac A; Kritharides L; Wilson A; Ng MK
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jan; 6(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 23347861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic uncertainties during assessment of serial coronary stenoses: an in vitro study.
    D'Souza GA; Peelukhana SV; Banerjee RK
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Feb; 136(2):021026. PubMed ID: 24362785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimal effect of collateral flow on coronary microvascular resistance in the presence of intermediate and noncritical coronary stenoses.
    Verhoeff BJ; van de Hoef TP; Spaan JA; Piek JJ; Siebes M
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2012 Aug; 303(4):H422-8. PubMed ID: 22730389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of hyperaemic microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from combined stenosis and microvascular resistance assessment.
    van de Hoef TP; Nolte F; EchavarrÍa-Pinto M; van Lavieren MA; Damman P; Chamuleau SA; Voskuil M; Verberne HJ; Henriques JP; van Eck-Smit BL; Koch KT; de Winter RJ; Spaan JA; Siebes M; Tijssen JG; Meuwissen M; Piek JJ
    Heart; 2014 Jun; 100(12):951-9. PubMed ID: 24727867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve.
    Kolli KK; Arif I; Peelukhana SV; Succop P; Back LH; Helmy TA; Leesar MA; Effat MA; Banerjee RK
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 24791716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coronary Flow Reserve and Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.
    Lee JM; Jung JH; Hwang D; Park J; Fan Y; Na SH; Doh JH; Nam CW; Shin ES; Koo BK
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Mar; 67(10):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 26965536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flow restoration post revascularization predicted by stenosis indexes: sensitivity to hemodynamic variability.
    Algranati D; Kassab GS; Lanir Y
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2013 Jul; 305(2):H145-54. PubMed ID: 23645461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discordance Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Reserve: Insights From Intracoronary Imaging and Physiological Assessment.
    Ahn SG; Suh J; Hung OY; Lee HS; Bouchi YH; Zeng W; Gandhi R; Eshtehardi P; Gogas BD; Samady H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(10):999-1007. PubMed ID: 28521932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic cutoff for pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: A patient-level analysis.
    Kolli KK; van de Hoef TP; Effat MA; Banerjee RK; Peelukhana SV; Succop P; Leesar MA; Imran A; Piek JJ; Helmy TA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 26424295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The diastolic flow velocity-pressure gradient relation and dpv50 to assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses.
    Marques KM; van Eenige MJ; Spruijt HJ; Westerhof N; Twisk J; Visser CA; Visser FC
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2006 Dec; 291(6):H2630-5. PubMed ID: 16920817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesions.
    Meuwissen M; Chamuleau SA; Siebes M; Schotborgh CE; Koch KT; de Winter RJ; Bax M; de Jong A; Spaan JA; Piek JJ
    Circulation; 2001 Jan; 103(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 11208673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of intracoronary frequency domain optical coherence tomography derived fractional flow reserve for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis.
    Zafar H; Sharif F; Leahy MJ
    Int Heart J; 2014; 55(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 24909988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fractional flow reserve assessment of left main stenosis in the presence of downstream coronary stenoses.
    Yong AS; Daniels D; De Bruyne B; Kim HS; Ikeno F; Lyons J; Pijls NH; Fearon WF
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Apr; 6(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 23549643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between non-invasive coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve to assess the functional significance of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity.
    Meimoun P; Sayah S; Luycx-Bore A; Boulanger J; Elmkies F; Benali T; Zemir H; Doutrelan L; Clerc J
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Apr; 24(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 21353763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hyperemic stenosis resistance index for evaluation of functional coronary lesion severity.
    Meuwissen M; Siebes M; Chamuleau SA; van Eck-Smit BL; Koch KT; de Winter RJ; Tijssen JG; Spaan JA; Piek JJ
    Circulation; 2002 Jul; 106(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 12135943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses.
    Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numerical modeling of the flow in stenosed coronary artery. The relationship between main hemodynamic parameters.
    Shalman E; Rosenfeld M; Dgany E; Einav S
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 Sep; 32(5):329-44. PubMed ID: 12102752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A patient-specific virtual stenotic model of the coronary artery to analyze the relationship between fractional flow reserve and wall shear stress.
    Lee KE; Kim GT; Lee JS; Chung JH; Shin ES; Shim EB
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 222():799-805. PubMed ID: 27522378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of heart rate on fractional flow reserve, pressure drop coefficient, and lesion flow coefficient for epicardial coronary stenosis in a porcine model.
    Kolli KK; Banerjee RK; Peelukhana SV; Helmy TA; Leesar MA; Arif I; Schneeberger EW; Hand D; Succop P; Gottliebson WM; Effat MA
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2011 Jan; 300(1):H382-7. PubMed ID: 20935151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.