345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12236256)
1. The right to die with dignity with the assistance of a physician: an Anglo, American and Australian international perspective.
Woods E
ILSA J Int Law; 1998; 4(2):817-34. PubMed ID: 12236256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician-assisted suicide: a current legal perspective.
Myers RS
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(3):345-61. PubMed ID: 12866524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The "right to die": on drawing (and erasing) lines.
Kamisar Y
Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):481-521. PubMed ID: 12385319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Who decides if there is "triumph in the ultimate agony?" Constitutional theory and the emerging right to die with dignity.
Goebel BC
William Mary Law Rev; 1996; 37(2):827-901. PubMed ID: 12173637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Too many physicians: physician-assisted suicide after Glucksberg/Quill.
Pratt DA
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1999; 9():E1-E67. PubMed ID: 16528815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to assisted suicide in Washington and Oregon: the courts won't allow a northwest passage.
Kline RL
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1996; 5(2):213-37. PubMed ID: 16086524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The bell tolls for a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(15):1098-1103. PubMed ID: 9321541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician-assisted suicide: a common law roadmap for state courts.
Meisel A
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):817-57. PubMed ID: 12455513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician-assisted suicide in the courts: moral equivalence, double effect, and clinical practice.
Brody H
Minn Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 82(4):939-63. PubMed ID: 11865917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Suicide: a constitutional right?"-- reflections eleven years later.
Marzen TJ; O'Dowd MK; Crone D; Balch TJ
Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):261-84. PubMed ID: 12385309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Supreme Court's assisted suicide opinions in international perspective: avoiding a bureaucracy of death.
Underwood JL
N D Law Rev; 1997; 73(4):641-84. PubMed ID: 11660631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The CCAR responsum on end of life issues: an American legal perspective.
Saperstein D; Mishkin D
CCAR J; 1997; 44(2):36-45. PubMed ID: 15712421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Supreme Court and physician-assisted suicide--rejecting assisted suicide but embracing euthanasia.
Orentlicher D
N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(17):1236-9. PubMed ID: 9340517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide.
Gaumer CP; Griffith PR
S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
Davidson SI
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted suicide and the competent terminally ill: on ordinary treatments and extraordinary policies.
Strasser M
Oregon Law Rev; 1995; 74():539-609. PubMed ID: 16086477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a right to physician-assisted suicide?
Bleich JD
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):795-815. PubMed ID: 12455512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reading the mystery passage narrowly: a legal, ethical and practical argument against physician assisted suicide.
Hickey MB
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):567-603. PubMed ID: 12755094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Physician-assisted suicide: three crucial distinctions.
Spritz N
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):869-80. PubMed ID: 12455517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Leaving the door ajar: the Supreme Court and assisted suicide.
Urofsky MI
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1998 Mar; 32(2):313-405. PubMed ID: 11657162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
