These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12236469)

  • 21. The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity trials.
    Maeder EM; Yamamoto S; McLaughlin KJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 68():101536. PubMed ID: 32033700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attractive but guilty: deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias.
    Patry MW
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 18763443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of social desirability and establishing nonracist credentials on mock juror decisions about Black defendants.
    Salerno JM; Kulak K; Smalarz L; Eerdmans RE; Lawrence ML; Dao T
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):100-118. PubMed ID: 36931852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
    Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Juror sensitivity to the cross-race effect.
    Abshire J; Bornstein BH
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):471-80. PubMed ID: 14593793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. "Race salience" in juror decision-making: misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions.
    Sommers SR; Ellsworth PC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(4):599-609. PubMed ID: 19513991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Race, witness credibility, and jury deliberation in a simulated drug trafficking trial.
    Shaw EV; Lynch M; Laguna S; Frenda SJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):215-228. PubMed ID: 34351204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations.
    Haegerich TM; Bottoms BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Aug; 24(4):421-48. PubMed ID: 10974801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case.
    Meaux LT; Cox J; Kopkin MR
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):724-736. PubMed ID: 31984048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Town vs. gown: a direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors.
    Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Tubb VA; Granillo EA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):452-66. PubMed ID: 21351133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is all sexual harassment viewed the same? Mock juror decisions in same- and cross-gender cases.
    Wayne JH; Riordan CM; Thomas KM
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Apr; 86(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 11393431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
    Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Canadian mock juror attitudes and decisions in domestic violence cases involving asian and white interracial and intraracial couples.
    Maeder EM; Mossière A; Cheung L
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Mar; 28(4):667-84. PubMed ID: 22929345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Will jurors correct for evidence interdependence in their verdicts? It depends.
    Pate M; Kienzle M; Vogler V
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 30266044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
    Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity.
    Keller SR; Wiener RL
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):376-94. PubMed ID: 21766327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: the effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination.
    Brewer TW
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 15638208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of harassment severity and organizational behavior on damage awards in a hostile work environment sexual harassment case.
    Cass SA; Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 19579260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. White mock jurors' moral emotional responses to viewing female victim photographs depend on the victim's race.
    Phalen HJ; Salerno JM; Adamoli M; Nadler J
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):666-685. PubMed ID: 38127550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.