These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12237213)
1. Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers. Jamison RN; Gracely RH; Raymond SA; Levine JG; Marino B; Herrmann TJ; Daly M; Fram D; Katz NP Pain; 2002 Sep; 99(1-2):341-7. PubMed ID: 12237213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement Comparability of Electronic and Paper Administration of Visual Analogue Scales: A Review of Published Studies. Byrom B; Elash CA; Eremenco S; Bodart S; Muehlhausen W; Platko JV; Watson C; Howry C Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2022 May; 56(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 35142989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A pilot assessment of alternative methods of quantifying dental pain with particular reference to dentine hypersensitivity. Gillam DG; Bulman JS; Newman HN Community Dent Health; 1997 Jun; 14(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 9225538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electronic pain questionnaires: a randomized, crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessment. Cook AJ; Roberts DA; Henderson MD; Van Winkle LC; Chastain DC; Hamill-Ruth RJ Pain; 2004 Jul; 110(1-2):310-7. PubMed ID: 15275781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unreliability of the visual analog scale in experimental pain assessment: a sensitivity and evoked potentials study. Kemp J; Despres O; Dufour A Pain Physician; 2012; 15(5):E693-9. PubMed ID: 22996863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a Mobile Health Electronic Visual Analog Scale App With a Traditional Paper Visual Analog Scale for Pain Evaluation: Cross-Sectional Observational Study. Turnbull A; Sculley D; Escalona-Marfil C; Riu-Gispert L; Ruiz-Moreno J; Gironès X; Coda A J Med Internet Res; 2020 Sep; 22(9):e18284. PubMed ID: 32940621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pain assessment in patients with low back pain: comparison of weekly recall and momentary electronic data. Jamison RN; Raymond SA; Slawsby EA; McHugo GJ; Baird JC J Pain; 2006 Mar; 7(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 16516825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department. Bijur PE; Latimer CT; Gallagher EJ Acad Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 10(4):390-2. PubMed ID: 12670856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new analogue scale for assessing children's pain: an initial validation study. McGrath PA; Seifert CE; Speechley KN; Booth JC; Stitt L; Gibson MC Pain; 1996 Mar; 64(3):435-443. PubMed ID: 8783307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. Hjermstad MJ; Fayers PM; Haugen DF; Caraceni A; Hanks GW; Loge JH; Fainsinger R; Aass N; Kaasa S; J Pain Symptom Manage; 2011 Jun; 41(6):1073-93. PubMed ID: 21621130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring pain intensity in older patients: a comparison of five scales. Nimmaanrat S; Thepsuwan A; Tipchatyotin S; Jensen MP BMC Geriatr; 2024 Jun; 24(1):556. PubMed ID: 38918711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the Hopkins Pain Rating Instrument with standard visual analogue and verbal descriptor scales in patients with cancer pain. Grossman SA; Sheidler VR; McGuire DB; Geer C; Santor D; Piantadosi S J Pain Symptom Manage; 1992 May; 7(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 1517641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parent visual analogue scale ratings of children's pain do not reliably reflect pain reported by child. Kelly AM; Powell CV; Williams A Pediatr Emerg Care; 2002 Jun; 18(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 12065998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do past pain events systematically impact pain ratings of healthy subjects or fibromyalgia patients? Staud R; Robinson ME; Price DD J Pain; 2010 Feb; 11(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 19783222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a digital version of the visual analog scale. Sindhu BS; Shechtman O; Tuckey L J Hand Ther; 2011; 24(4):356-63; quiz 364. PubMed ID: 21820864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales: a cross sectional description of pain etiology groups. Lund I; Lundeberg T; Sandberg L; Budh CN; Kowalski J; Svensson E BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():31. PubMed ID: 16202149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults. Li L; Liu X; Herr K Pain Med; 2007 Apr; 8(3):223-34. PubMed ID: 17371409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pain measurement: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) in clinical trials with OTC analgesics in headache. Aicher B; Peil H; Peil B; Diener HC Cephalalgia; 2012 Feb; 32(3):185-97. PubMed ID: 22332207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of pain intensity in emergency medicine: a validation study. Daoust R; Beaulieu P; Manzini C; Chauny JM; Lavigne G Pain; 2008 Sep; 138(3):565-570. PubMed ID: 18359566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]