These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12238690)

  • 21. The effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):875-80. PubMed ID: 20830883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of oxalate desensitizer with different resin cement-retained indirect composite inlays on fracture resistance of teeth.
    Shafiei F; Alavi AA; Karimi F; Ansarifard E
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 23279061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Replacement of resin-based composite: evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching.
    Gordan VV; Mondragon E; Shen C
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Apr; 33(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 11989376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars, restored with ceromer or heat-pressed ceramic inlays and fixed with dual-resin cements.
    Ortega VL; Pegoraro LF; Conti PC; do Valle AL; Bonfante G
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 15089948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
    Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations.
    Muhlbauer JA; Dunn WJ; Roberts HW; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations.
    Fennis WM; Kuijs RH; Kreulen CM; Verdonschot N; Creugers NH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 15237878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars.
    Magne P; Knezevic A
    Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1264-8. PubMed ID: 19539358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro.
    Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance.
    Allara FW; Diefenderfer KE; Molinaro JD
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Bitter K; Meyer-Lueckel H; Fotiadis N; Blunck U; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM; Paris S
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jun; 43(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 20536574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Static and fatigue fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores.
    Hayashi M; Sugeta A; Takahashi Y; Imazato S; Ebisu S
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1178-86. PubMed ID: 18374974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Yildirim C
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.