BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12238745)

  • 1. Decision making in health care: limitations of the substituted judgement principle.
    Bailey S
    Nurs Ethics; 2002 Sep; 9(5):483-93. PubMed ID: 12238745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A philosophical discussion of end-of-life decision-making methods for incompetent patients.
    Edwards D
    Int J Palliat Nurs; 2002 Mar; 8(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 11923743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach.
    Phillips J; Wendler D
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 41(9):723-30. PubMed ID: 25360029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical fallacies in the debate on substituted judgment.
    Johansson M; Broström L
    Health Care Anal; 2014 Mar; 22(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 22367526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Substituted judgment: the limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision making.
    Torke AM; Alexander GC; Lantos J
    J Gen Intern Med; 2008 Sep; 23(9):1514-7. PubMed ID: 18618201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On substituted arguments.
    Sulmasy DP; Sulmasy LS
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 41(9):732-3. PubMed ID: 25673768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Autonomy and dementia Part II: autonomy and representation: a possible combination?].
    Rigaux N
    Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil; 2011 Jun; 9(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 21690029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Love as a regulative ideal in surrogate decision making.
    Stonestreet EL
    J Med Philos; 2014 Oct; 39(5):523-42. PubMed ID: 25223412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new standard for incapacitated patient decision making: the clinical standard of surrogate empowerment.
    Tunzi M
    J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(4):316-30. PubMed ID: 23469692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surrogate decision-making: judgment standard preferences of older adults.
    Moore CD; Sparr J; Sherman S; Avery L
    Soc Work Health Care; 2003; 37(2):1-16. PubMed ID: 12959484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision making in acute care: a practical framework supporting the 'best interests' principle.
    Bailey S
    Nurs Ethics; 2006 May; 13(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 16711187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Autonomy, benevolence, and Alzheimer's disease.
    Sailors PR
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2001; 10(2):184-93. PubMed ID: 11302096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Substituted judgment in real life.
    Dresser R
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 41(9):731-8. PubMed ID: 25378551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Socially and temporally extended end-of-life decision-making process for dementia patients.
    Muramoto O
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Jun; 37(6):339-43. PubMed ID: 21292697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision making by surrogates.
    Day LJ
    Crit Care Nurse; 2000 Apr; 20(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 11873744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research.
    Buller T
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Aug; 41(8):701-7. PubMed ID: 25118248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain trauma and surrogate decision making: dogmas, challenges, and response.
    Nelson JL; Frader J
    J Clin Ethics; 2004; 15(4):264-76. PubMed ID: 15830555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Role of a Hospital Ethics Consultation Service in Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients.
    Courtwright AM; Abrams J; Robinson EM
    J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Jun; 14(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 28265798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advance Directives: The Principle of Determining Authenticity.
    Carter M
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Jan; 52(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 35143071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "What the patient would have decided": a fundamental problem with the substituted judgment standard.
    Broström L; Johansson M; Nielsen MK
    Med Health Care Philos; 2007 Sep; 10(3):265-78. PubMed ID: 17120112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.