These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12239037)

  • 1. Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation.
    Nodine CF; Mello-Thoms C; Kundel HL; Weinstein SP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 12239037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study.
    Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Conant EF; Weinstein SP
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):396-402. PubMed ID: 17255410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How experience and training influence mammography expertise.
    Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Mello-Thoms C; Weinstein SP; Orel SG; Sullivan DC; Conant EF
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Oct; 6(10):575-85. PubMed ID: 10516859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses.
    Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Lauver SC; Toto LC
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Dec; 3(12):1000-6. PubMed ID: 9017014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of breast cancer: eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation.
    Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jan; 10(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12529023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms.
    Krupinski EA
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Feb; 3(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 8796654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading.
    Mello-Thoms C; Hardesty L; Sumkin J; Ganott M; Hakim C; Britton C; Stalder J; Maitz G
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 16039537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blinded review of retrospectively visible unreported breast cancers: an eye-position analysis.
    Nodine CF; Mello-Thoms C; Weinstein SP; Kundel HL; Conant EF; Heller-Savoy RE; Rowlings SE; Birnbaum JA
    Radiology; 2001 Oct; 221(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 11568329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influences of Radiology Trainees on Screening Mammography Interpretation.
    Hawley JR; Taylor CR; Cubbison AM; Erdal BS; Yildiz VO; Carkaci S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 May; 13(5):554-61. PubMed ID: 26924162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Breast Imaging Experience During Residency Translate Into Improved Initial Performance in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?
    Zhang J; Grimm LJ; Lo JY; Johnson KS; Ghate SV; Walsh R; Mazurowski MA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jul; 12(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 26143567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The perception of breast cancer: what differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography?
    Mello-Thoms C; Dunn S; Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Weinstein SP
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Sep; 9(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 12238541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms.
    Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Krupinski EA; Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 18572124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography?
    Berg WA; D'Orsi CJ; Jackson VP; Bassett LW; Beam CA; Lewis RS; Crewson PE
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):871-80. PubMed ID: 12202727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fractal analysis of visual search activity for mass detection during mammographic screening.
    Alamudun F; Yoon HJ; Hudson KB; Morin-Ducote G; Hammond T; Tourassi GD
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):832-846. PubMed ID: 28079249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiology resident mammography training: interpretation difficulty and error-making patterns.
    Grimm LJ; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jul; 21(7):888-92. PubMed ID: 24928157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual search of mammographic images: influence of lesion subtlety.
    Krupinski EA
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):965-9. PubMed ID: 16023379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying error-making patterns in assessment of mammographic BI-RADS descriptors among radiology residents using statistical pattern recognition.
    Mazurowski MA; Barnhart HX; Baker JA; Tourassi GD
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):865-71. PubMed ID: 22459643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How does the perception of a lesion influence visual search strategy in mammogram reading?
    Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 16488839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.