These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12239057)

  • 1. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients.
    Loewe C; Schoder M; Rand T; Hoffmann U; Sailer J; Kos T; Lammer J; Thurnher S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):1013-21. PubMed ID: 12239057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pedal angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: first-pass i.v. contrast-enhanced MR angiography with blood pool contrast medium versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Kos S; Reisinger C; Aschwanden M; Bongartz GM; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 19234277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Routine use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
    Deutschmann HA; Schoellnast H; Portugaller HR; Preidler KW; Reittner P; Tillich M; Pilger E; Szolar DH
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):762-70. PubMed ID: 16625410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    van den Bosch HC; Westenberg JJ; Caris R; Duijm LE; Tielbeek AV; Cuypers PW; de Roos A
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):337-46. PubMed ID: 23143021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Bongartz G; Jaeger K; Heidecker HG; Thalhammer C; Schulte AC; Hashagen C; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):901-8. PubMed ID: 16641335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
    Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-station bolus-chase MR angiography with a stationary table: a simple alternative to automated-table techniques.
    Pandharipande PV; Lee VS; Reuss PM; Charles HW; Rosen RJ; Krinsky GA; Weinreb JC; Rofsky NM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1583-9. PubMed ID: 12438059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Huegli RW; Thalhammer C; Jacob AL; Jaeger K; Bilecen D
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 66(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17658713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Neufang A; Düber C; Krummenauer F; Küstner E; Laub G; Thelen M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):171-9. PubMed ID: 10628475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: evaluation of a high spatial and temporal resolution 3-T MR protocol with a low total dose of gadolinium versus conventional angiography.
    Attenberger UI; Haneder S; Morelli JN; Diehl SJ; Schoenberg SO; Michaely HJ
    Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):879-87. PubMed ID: 20959539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography from the distal aorta to the ankle joint with a step-by-step technique.
    Huber A; Heuck A; Baur A; Helmberger T; Waggershauser T; Billing A; Heiss M; Petsch R; Reiser M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1291-8. PubMed ID: 11044026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience.
    Meaney JF; Ridgway JP; Chakraverty S; Robertson I; Kessel D; Radjenovic A; Kouwenhoven M; Kassner A; Smith MA
    Radiology; 1999 Apr; 211(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 10189454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by using Gadofosveset at 3.0 T: diagnostic accuracy compared with selective DSA.
    Bonel HM; Saar B; Hoppe H; Keo HH; Husmann M; Nikolaou K; Ludwig K; Szucs-Farkas Z; Srivastav S; Kickuth R
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):879-90. PubMed ID: 19864508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.
    Rofsky NM; Johnson G; Adelman MA; Rosen RJ; Krinsky GA; Weinreb JC
    Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 9314979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in humans for the detection of infrainguinal arterial stenoses before and after percutaneous angioplasty.
    Zorger N; Volk M; Hamer OW; Lenhart M; Seitz J; Butz B; Paetzel C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):867-72. PubMed ID: 16177402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced MR angiography of the iliofemoral and calf arteries: a large-scale multicenter trial.
    Thurnher S; Miller S; Schneider G; Ballarati C; Bongartz G; Herborn CU; Schoenberg S; Cova MA; Morana G; Niazi K; Iezzi R; Taupitz M; Bluemke DA; Kreitner KF; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1223-37. PubMed ID: 17954665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography.
    Andreisek G; Pfammatter T; Goepfert K; Nanz D; Hervo P; Koppensteiner R; Weishaupt D
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):610-20. PubMed ID: 17179394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view.
    Nael K; Villablanca JP; Pope WB; McNamara TO; Laub G; Finn JP
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 17255428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
    Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
    Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.