BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12239480)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of two adhesive composite cements for the suppression of dentinal cold sensitivity.
    Sensat ML; Brackett WW; Meinberg TA; Beatty MW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12239480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel.
    Duarte S; Botta AC; Meire M; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18762032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots.
    Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Oct; 12(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 10649916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results.
    Perdigão J; Anauate-Netto C; Carmo AR; Hodges JS; Cordeiro HJ; Lewgoy HR; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N; Amore R
    Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):777-84. PubMed ID: 15553285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the flexural strength of five adhesive resin cements.
    Pace LL; Hummel SK; Marker VA; Bolouri A
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching adhesive on the reduction of postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
    Hajizadeh H; Akbari M; Ghavamnasiri M; Abedini S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):9-16. PubMed ID: 18997911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of fatigue loading on the quality of the cement layer and retention strength of carbon fiber post-resin composite core restorations.
    Bolhuis P; de Gee A; Feilzer A
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 15853108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shear bond strength between feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic and human dentine for two adhesive cements.
    Graiff L; Piovan C; Vigolo P; Mason PN
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 18266655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of luting resin cements to human dentin.
    Hiraishi N; Yiu CK; King NM; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 18573523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an Erbium:YAG laser.
    Trajtenberg CP; Pereira PN; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Oct; 17(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 15575443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of dentin desensitizers and dentin bonding agents on dentin permeability.
    Jain P; Reinhardt JW; Krell KV
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 11763898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histopathologic study on pulp response to single-bottle and self-etching adhesive systems.
    Medina VO; Shinkai K; Shirono M; Tanaka N; Katoh Y
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):330-42. PubMed ID: 12120769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extrusion shear strength between an alumina-based ceramic and three different cements.
    Borges GA; de Goes MF; Platt JA; Moore K; de Menezes FH; Vedovato E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 17854622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microtensile bond strength of photoactivated and autopolymerized adhesive systems to root dentin using translucent and opaque fiber-reinforced composite posts.
    Mallmann A; Jacques LB; Valandro LF; Muench A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 17394915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin.
    Hikita K; Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J; Ikeda T; Van Landuyt K; Maida T; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16426673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.