These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1055 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12239481)
1. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin. Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of in vitro caries-like lesions and natural caries lesions at crown margins. Arnold WH; Sonkol T; Zoellner A; Gaengler P J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 17672837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs. Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of direct digital radiography for detecting occlusal caries in primary teeth compared with conventional radiography and visual inspection: an in vitro study. Dias da Silva PR; Martins Marques M; Steagall W; Medeiros Mendes F; Lascala CA Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Sep; 39(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 20729186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of wavelet and discrete cosine transform compression of digital radiographs on the detection of subtle proximal caries. ROC analysis. Schulze RK; Richter A; d'Hoedt B Caries Res; 2008; 42(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 18701823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions. Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the validator and the validation method on the outcome of occlusal caries diagnosis. Wenzel A; Verdonschot EH; Truin GJ; König KG Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 8001061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and visual response. An in vitro study. Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; McDavid WD Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12076051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of visual inspection, fiber-optic transillumination, and various radiographic image modalities for the detection of occlusal caries in extracted non-cavitated teeth. Wenzel A; Verdonschot EH; Truin GJ; König KG J Dent Res; 1992 Dec; 71(12):1934-7. PubMed ID: 1452897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems. Hintze H Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital enhancement of radiographs for assessment of interproximal dental caries. Seneadza V; Koob A; Kaltschmitt J; Staehle HJ; Duwenhoegger J; Eickholz P Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Mar; 37(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 18316505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations. Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relating visual and radiographic ranked scoring systems for occlusal caries detection to histological and microbiological evidence. Ricketts DN; Ekstrand KR; Kidd EA; Larsen T Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 12022452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study. Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography. Ferreira RI; Haiter-Neto F; Tabchoury CP; de Paiva GA; Bóscolo FN Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 16878203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of dentin involvement in occlusal caries based on visual and radiographic examination of the teeth. Nytun RB; Raadal M; Espelid I Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Jun; 100(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 1631482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro comparison of the ability of fibre-optic transillumination, visual inspection and radiographs to detect occlusal caries and evaluate lesion depth. Côrtes DF; Ekstrand KR; Elias-Boneta AR; Ellwood RP Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 11093016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of histological and radiographic depth and width of occlusal caries lesions: a methodological study. Bakhshandeh A; Ekstrand KR; Qvist V Caries Res; 2011; 45(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 22024919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars. Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]