692 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12242834)
1. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
Abrams SH
Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration.
Grossmann Y; Pasciuta M; Finger IM
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16543025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Custom copings for accurate impressions of multiple internal connection implants.
Ntounis A; Pelekanos S
Implant Dent; 2010 Oct; 19(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 20881806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
Walton TR
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The "first implant": protocol for the GP, Part 3.
Tischler M; Ganz SD
Dent Today; 2011 Dec; 30(12):64, 66, 68-9. PubMed ID: 22324106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Technique and materials for obtaining accurate impressions in 60 to 90 seconds.
Werrin SR
Dent Today; 2003 Mar; 22(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 12705017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study.
Reddy JM; Prashanti E; Kumar GV; Suresh Sajjan MC; Mathew X
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A modified occlusal registration and implant transfer technique.
Kaufman M; Cranin AN; Sayed A; Ley J; DeGrado J; Banton B
J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(3-4):258-62. PubMed ID: 9524504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants.
Marder MZ; Marder RW
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Master cast implant impression: using the open-tray technique.
Briley TF
Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Oct; 13(10):73-80. PubMed ID: 12455316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A simplified all-ceramic system for complex cases.
Haag J; Stevens R
Dent Today; 2009 Dec; 28(12):78, 80-1. PubMed ID: 20055043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the occlusal contact of crowns fabricated with the bite impression method.
Makino S; Okada D; Shin C; Ogura R; Ikeda M; Miura H
J Med Dent Sci; 2013 Sep; 60(3):73-81. PubMed ID: 24146169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impression success using the dual arch technique.
Small BW
Gen Dent; 2005; 53(6):396-7. PubMed ID: 16366044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method for making the implant-supported record bases.
Savabi O; Yosefimoghadam A; Nejatidanesh F
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(6):300-2. PubMed ID: 20017647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stabilized record base for implant treatment.
Nimmo SS; Nimmo A
J Prosthodont; 2010 Oct; 19(7):586-8. PubMed ID: 20723017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simplified impression technique for implant-supported crowns.
Haubenreich JE; Robinson FG
Dent Clin North Am; 2006 Jul; 50(3):439-49, vii. PubMed ID: 16818025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impressions in implant dentistry.
Bhakta S; Vere J; Calder I; Patel R
Br Dent J; 2011 Oct; 211(8):361-7. PubMed ID: 22015512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
Kuo SB; Hong HH; Tsai TP; Shen YF
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time-saving method for the fabrication of a definitive cast for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Daher T; Meserkhani PV; Baba NZ; Morgano SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jul; 98(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 17631175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
