These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12243106)

  • 1. Indiscriminate data aggregations in meta-analysis. A cause for concern among policy makers and social scientists.
    Lopez-Lee D
    Eval Rev; 2002 Oct; 26(5):520-44. PubMed ID: 12243106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The case for failed meta-analyses.
    Naylor CD
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 9238567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.
    Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Browman GP
    CMAJ; 1997 May; 156(10):1411-6. PubMed ID: 9164400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Meta-Jeopardy": the crisis of representation in qualitative metasynthesis.
    Sandelowski M
    Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 16487774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Meta-analyses and systematic errors in publications].
    Bias R
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(1-2):39-40. PubMed ID: 11281127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold?
    Papageorgiou SN
    J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 25404669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis.
    Muncer S; Taylor S; Craigie M
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 May; 38(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 11972663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding research: 1. Methodologies used to answer research questions.
    Baxter H
    J Wound Care; 2001 Jul; 10(7):269-72. PubMed ID: 12964346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability.
    Higgins PA; Straub AJ
    Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis of best-evidence synthesis?
    Eysenck HJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Sep; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 9238555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of results with homeopathic remedies.
    Buckman R
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1128-9. PubMed ID: 10234340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis: current issues in research synthesis.
    Olkin I
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1253-7; discussion 1259-62. PubMed ID: 8817799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?
    Afshari A; Wetterslev J; Smith AF
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Jan; 72(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 27804113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is Wrong With Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: If You Want the Right Answer, Ask the Right Question!
    Thoma A; Eaves FF
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Nov; 36(10):1198-1201. PubMed ID: 27756743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation.
    Lockwood C; Munn Z; Porritt K
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 26262565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice.
    Zlowodzki M; Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Tornetta P; Bhandari M;
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Oct; 78(5):598-609. PubMed ID: 17966018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis and use of tests of heterogeneity in neurosurgery.
    Cheong JY; Van Gelder JM
    J Clin Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 17(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 20056420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.