295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12243160)
1. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
Baer T; Moore BC; Kluk K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1133-44. PubMed ID: 12243160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
Vickers DA; Moore BC; Baer T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1164-75. PubMed ID: 11519583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
Johnson EE; Dillon H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
Johnson EE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues.
Cox RM; Alexander GC; Johnson J; Rivera I
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 21522068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.
Leigh-Paffenroth ED; Elangovan S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):393-404. PubMed ID: 21993047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech recognition in noise as a function of highpass-filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions.
Vinay ; Baer T; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):606-9. PubMed ID: 18273950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limiting high-frequency hearing aid gain in listeners with and without suspected cochlear dead regions.
Mackersie CL; Crocker TL; Davis RA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2004; 15(7):498-507. PubMed ID: 15484599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC
Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise.
Summers V; Molis MR; Müsch H; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 12677110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding.
Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1706-17. PubMed ID: 12656402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech recognition as a function of high-pass filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions.
Vinay ; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):542-53. PubMed ID: 17622189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the NAL(R) and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids.
Peters RW; Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
Br J Audiol; 2000 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 10759075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Importance of Extended High-Frequency Speech Information in the Recognition of Digits, Words, and Sentences in Quiet and Noise.
Polspoel S; Kramer SE; van Dijk B; Smits C
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):913-920. PubMed ID: 34772838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved Sensitivity of Digits-in-Noise Test to High-Frequency Hearing Loss.
Motlagh Zadeh L; Silbert NH; Swanepoel W; Moore DR
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):565-573. PubMed ID: 33928924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Slow- and Fast-Acting Compression on Hearing-Impaired Listeners' Consonant-Vowel Identification in Interrupted Noise.
Kowalewski B; Zaar J; Fereczkowski M; MacDonald EN; Strelcyk O; May T; Dau T
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518800870. PubMed ID: 30311552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modification of the Threshold Equalising Noise (TEN) test for cochlear dead regions for use with steeply sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
Markessis E; Kapadia S; Munro K; Moore BC
Int J Audiol; 2006 Feb; 45(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 16566247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
