BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12243160)

  • 21. Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Glasberg BR; Puria S
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):907-22. PubMed ID: 18685497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Benefits of amplification for speech recognition in background noise.
    Turner CW; Henry BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1675-80. PubMed ID: 12398472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario.
    Woods WS; Kalluri S; Pentony S; Nooraei N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4268-78. PubMed ID: 23742377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea.
    Huss M; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3283-94. PubMed ID: 14714809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recognition of low-pass-filtered consonants in noise with normal and impaired high-frequency hearing.
    Horwitz AR; Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):409-16. PubMed ID: 11831814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of low-pass filtering on identification of nonsense syllables in quiet by school-age children with and without cochlear dead regions.
    Malicka AN; Munro KJ; Baer T; Baker RJ; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):458-69. PubMed ID: 23337997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dead regions in the cochlea: implications for speech recognition and applicability of articulation index theory.
    Vestergaard MD
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42(5):249-61. PubMed ID: 12916698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Villchur revisited: another look at automatic gain control simulation of recruiting hearing loss.
    Duchnowski P; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3170-81. PubMed ID: 8550941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using transposition to improve consonant discrimination and detection for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Robinson JD; Baer T; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jun; 46(6):293-308. PubMed ID: 17530514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Enhanced discrimination of low-frequency sounds for subjects with high-frequency dead regions.
    Moore BC; Vinay SN
    Brain; 2009 Feb; 132(Pt 2):524-36. PubMed ID: 19036764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 2921418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 11527034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A clinical perspective on cochlear dead regions: intelligibility of speech and subjective hearing aid benefit.
    Preminger JE; Carpenter R; Ziegler CH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Sep; 16(8):600-13; quiz 631-2. PubMed ID: 16295247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exploring the limits of frequency lowering.
    Souza PE; Arehart KH; Kates JM; Croghan NB; Gehani N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1349-63. PubMed ID: 23785188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech recognition in a special case of low-frequency hearing loss.
    Van Tasell DJ; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Apr; 75(4):1207-12. PubMed ID: 6725771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception.
    Drullman R; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1053-64. PubMed ID: 8132899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.
    Moore BC; Huss M; Vickers DA; Glasberg BR; Alcántara JI
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Aug; 34(4):205-24. PubMed ID: 10997450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.