These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12243306)

  • 1. Multiplicity, directional (type III) errors, and the null hypothesis.
    Shaffer JP
    Psychol Methods; 2002 Sep; 7(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 12243306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Controlling the rate of Type I error over a large set of statistical tests.
    Keselman HJ; Cribbie R; Holland B
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2002 May; 55(Pt 1):27-39. PubMed ID: 12034010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses.
    Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controlling the maximum familywise Type I error rate in analyses of multivariate experiments.
    Bird KD; Hadzi-Pavlovic D
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Jun; 19(2):265-80. PubMed ID: 24079933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An inferential confidence interval method of establishing statistical equivalence that corrects Tryon's (2001) reduction factor.
    Tryon WW; Lewis C
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):272-7. PubMed ID: 18778155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates.
    Dudoit S; van der Laan MJ; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article13. PubMed ID: 16646791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.
    Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Graphical approaches for the control of generalized error rates.
    Robertson DS; Wason JMS; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(23):3135-3155. PubMed ID: 32557848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study.
    Dudoit S; Gilbert HN; van der Laan MJ
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):716-44. PubMed ID: 18932138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Many tests of significance: new methods for controlling type I errors.
    Keselman HJ; Miller CW; Holland B
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):420-31. PubMed ID: 22040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies.
    Cramer AO; van Ravenzwaaij D; Matzke D; Steingroever H; Wetzels R; Grasman RP; Waldorp LJ; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):640-7. PubMed ID: 26374437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous multiple comparison procedures in psychiatric research.
    Hall W; Bird KD
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1986 Mar; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 3460585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiplicity in multiple regression: Defining the issue, evaluating solutions, and integrating perspectives.
    Anderson SF
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; 28(6):1223-1241. PubMed ID: 35588079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Setting an optimal α that minimizes errors in null hypothesis significance tests.
    Mudge JF; Baker LF; Edge CB; Houlahan JE
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e32734. PubMed ID: 22389720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: the multiple problems of multiplicity-whether and how to correct for many statistical tests.
    Streiner DL
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2015 Oct; 102(4):721-8. PubMed ID: 26245806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiplicity adjustments in testing for bioequivalence.
    Hua SY; Xu S; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 24980563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Error, power, and cluster separation rates of pairwise multiple testing procedures.
    Shaffer JP; Kowalchuk RK; Keselman HJ
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 23646989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constructing multiple test procedures for partially ordered hypothesis sets.
    Edwards D; Madsen J
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5116-24. PubMed ID: 17476650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online control of the familywise error rate.
    Tian J; Ramdas A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):976-993. PubMed ID: 33413033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical inference for a linear function of medians: confidence intervals, hypothesis testing, and sample size requirements.
    Bonett DG; Price RM
    Psychol Methods; 2002 Sep; 7(3):370-83. PubMed ID: 12243307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.