327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12243715)
1. Indices of torso asymmetry related to spinal deformity in scoliosis.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Oct; 17(8):559-68. PubMed ID: 12243715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of spinal deformity in scoliosis from torso surface cross sections.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1583-91. PubMed ID: 11462091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Cobb angles measured manually, calculated from 3-D spinal reconstruction, and estimated from torso asymmetry.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2002 Aug; 5(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 12186706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic algorithm-neural network estimation of cobb angle from torso asymmetry in scoliosis.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
J Biomech Eng; 2002 Oct; 124(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 12405591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis.
Kotwicki T; Kinel E; Stryla W; Szulc A
Scoliosis; 2007 Dec; 2():18. PubMed ID: 18053172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rasterstereographic analysis of axial back surface rotation in standing versus forward bending posture in idiopathic scoliosis.
Hackenberg L; Hierholzer E; Bullmann V; Liljenqvist U; Götze C
Eur Spine J; 2006 Jul; 15(7):1144-9. PubMed ID: 16429283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in surface and radiographic deformity after Universal Spine System for right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is rib-hump reassertion a mechanical problem of the thoracic cage rather than an effect of relative anterior spinal overgrowth?
Pratt RK; Webb JK; Burwell RG; Cole AA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(16):1778-87. PubMed ID: 11493850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of the anterior chest wall deformity in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Mao SH; Qiu Y; Zhu ZZ; Zhu F; Liu Z; Wang B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(9):E540-8. PubMed ID: 22020591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part II: relation between spinal deformity and patient outcomes.
Watanabe K; Hasegawa K; Hirano T; Uchiyama S; Endo N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(10):1202-5. PubMed ID: 15897836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Double Rib Contour Sign (DRCS) in lateral spinal radiographs: aetiologic implications for scoliosis.
Grivas TB; Dangas S; Polyzois BD; Samelis P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():38-43. PubMed ID: 15456003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface topography asymmetry maps categorizing external deformity in scoliosis.
Komeili A; Westover LM; Parent EC; Moreau M; El-Rich M; Adeeb S
Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):973-83.e2. PubMed ID: 24361358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy, reliability, and validity of a 3-dimensional scanner for assessing torso shape in idiopathic scoliosis.
Gorton GE; Young ML; Masso PD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(11):957-65. PubMed ID: 22020589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiographic measurement error of the scoliotic curve angle depending on positioning of the patient and the side of scoliotic curve.
Schmid SL; Buck FM; Böni T; Farshad M
Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 26423748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Segmental torso masses in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Keenan BE; Izatt MT; Askin GN; Labrom RD; Pettet GJ; Pearcy MJ; Adam CJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Aug; 29(7):773-9. PubMed ID: 24973826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lung function asymmetry in children with congenital and infantile scoliosis.
Redding G; Song K; Inscore S; Effmann E; Campbell R
Spine J; 2008; 8(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 17923444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monitoring for idiopathic scoliosis curve progression using surface topography asymmetry analysis of the torso in adolescents.
Komeili A; Westover L; Parent EC; El-Rich M; Adeeb S
Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):743-51. PubMed ID: 25615848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.
Takács M; Orlovits Z; Jáger B; Kiss RM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200245. PubMed ID: 29985957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of a quantitative clinical measurement tool of trunk posture in idiopathic scoliosis.
Fortin C; Feldman DE; Cheriet F; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E988-94. PubMed ID: 20700086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spinal deformity and back surface asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Armstrong JG; Moreland MS
J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 3334733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of two-parameter scoliometer values for predicting scoliotic Cobb angle.
Ma HH; Tai CL; Chen LH; Niu CC; Chen WJ; Lai PL
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Dec; 16(1):136. PubMed ID: 29202876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
