These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 122524)

  • 1. Susceptibility of cephalothin-resistant gram-negative bacilli to piperacillin, cefuroxime, and other selected antibiotics.
    George WL; Lewis RP; Meyer RD
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Mar; 13(3):484-9. PubMed ID: 122524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro susceptibility of cephalothin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Amikacin and selected new beta-lactam agents.
    McNamara BT; Meyer RD; Pasiecznik KA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 May; 21(5):753-7. PubMed ID: 6213196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antibacterial activity of selected beta-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics against cephalothin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.
    Lewis RP; Meyer RD; Kraus LL
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 May; 9(5):780-6. PubMed ID: 949175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro activity of piperacillin compared with that of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, ampicillin, cephalothin, and cefamandole against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae.
    Shah PP; Briedis DJ; Robson HG; Conterato JP
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Mar; 15(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 111609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro antibacterial activity of a new 1-oxa cephalosporin compound.
    Downs JT; Andriole VT
    Yale J Biol Med; 1980; 53(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 6446810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Antibacterial activity of cefotaxim in comparison with seven cephalosporins].
    Braveny I; Dickert H; Machka K
    Infection; 1979; 7(5):231-6. PubMed ID: 389804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Piperacillin (T-1220), a new semisynthetic penicillin: in vitro antimicrobial activity comparison with carbenicillin, ticarcillin, ampicillin, cephalothin, cefamandole and cefoxitin.
    Jones RN; Thornsberry C; Barry AL; Fuchs PC; Gavan TL; Gerlach EH
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1977 Dec; 30(12):1107-14. PubMed ID: 599084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [In vitro studies with piperacillin. Effectiveness against enterobacteriaceae and pseudomonas aeruginosa compared to other antibiotics (author's transl)].
    Baier R; Puppel H
    Med Klin; 1979 Dec; 74(50):1923-7. PubMed ID: 120489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Piperacillin, a new penicillin active against many bacteria resistant to other penicillins.
    Fu KP; Neu HC
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Mar; 13(3):358-67. PubMed ID: 122519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro activity of cefamandole, cefoxitin, cefuroxime, and carbenicillin, alone and in combination with aminoglycosides against Serratia marcescens.
    Miller MA; Yousuf M; Griffin PS; Bartlett M; Crane JK
    Microbiol Immunol; 1979; 23(10):955-64. PubMed ID: 390321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro susceptibility of cephalothin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae to cefoxitin and BL-S786.
    Meyer RD
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1977 Apr; 30(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 324961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The sensitivity of gentamicin-resistant gram-negative bacilli to cefotaxime, other cephalosporins and aminoglycosides.
    Stephens M; Potten M; Bint AJ
    Infection; 1979; 7(3):109-12. PubMed ID: 478651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of in vitro activities of eight new beta-lactam compounds against cephalothin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from hospital patients.
    Costopoulos C; Legakis NJ; Papafragas E; Marinis E
    Chemotherapy; 1984; 30(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 6610538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro activities of moxalactam and cefotaxime against aerobic gram-negative bacilli.
    Jorgensen JH; Crawford SA; Alexander GA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Jun; 17(6):937-42. PubMed ID: 6250470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of nine cephalosporins against Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.
    Verbist L
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Oct; 10(4):657-63. PubMed ID: 984801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antibacterial activity of HR-756, cefoxitin and cefuroxine against multiply antibiotic-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Legakis NJ; Kafetzis DA; Papadatos CJ; Papavassiliou JT
    Chemotherapy; 1980; 26(5):334-43. PubMed ID: 6248301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of cefoxitin and cefamandole.
    Adams HG; Stilwell GA; Turck M
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Jun; 9(6):1019-24. PubMed ID: 820241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antimicrobial activity of tobramycin and gentamicin used in combination with cephalothin and carbenicillin.
    Klastersky J; Henri A; Vandenborre L
    Am J Med Sci; 1973 Jul; 266(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 4198684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences between cephalothin and newer parenterally absorbed cephalosporins in vitro: a justification for separate disks.
    Washington JA II
    J Infect Dis; 1978 May; 137 Suppl():S32-S37. PubMed ID: 349096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Susceptibility of "enterobacteria" to penicillins, cephalosporins, lincomycins, erythromycin, and rifampin.
    Finland M; Garner C; Wilcox C; Sabath LD
    J Infect Dis; 1976 Aug; 134 Suppl():S75-96. PubMed ID: 823280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.