These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction. Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument. Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: indications and complications, 1979 to 1984. Broekhuizen FF; Washington JM; Johnson F; Hamilton PR Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):338-42. PubMed ID: 3822282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries. Mesleh RA; Al-Sawadi HM; Kurdi AM Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Foetal and maternal outcome of vacuum extraction. Gachiri JR; Rogo KO East Afr Med J; 1991 Jul; 68(7):539-46. PubMed ID: 1756706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Anate M West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vacuum application through a nonfully dilated cervix: a viable option. Sadan O; Ginath S; Gomel A; Lurie S; Rotmensch S; Golan A; Boaz M; Glezerman M Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Oct; 268(4):281-3. PubMed ID: 12764622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A new vacuum extraction system with a ball joint and detachment warning--in vitro studies and clinical use]. Korell M; King S; Hepp H Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2000; 204(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 10909164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup. Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Kanarek KS Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical experience with the Silc Cup Vacuum Extractor. Low J; Ng TY; Chew SY Singapore Med J; 1993 Apr; 34(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 8266153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries. Greis JB; Bieniarz J; Scommegna A Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria. Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998. Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]